<html> Yep! I agree with Joseph. I do not have high speed and never will in a the rural area where I live. Web based forums are no good for me. Terry Beckingham At 09:36 PM 1/20/2013 -0500, you wrote: <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Friends, Can I inject a tiny little whimper here on behalf of those of us who (due to living in a rural area) are still stuck using a dial-up internet connection? Please. Anything that involves "Web" is more fraught with hassle and time-waste than plain, Web-free email. Have pity, Joseph On Jan 10, 2013, at 10:24 PM, John Formsma wrote: <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Gee whillikers, Joe. :-) A good web-based system is not really all that complicated, and offers a lot of benefits. I'm not talking about Higher Logic, which is clunky at best. I'm curious as to how many web-based systems you've visited in the last year. Which ones were so bad? -- John Formsma, RPT Blue Mountain, MS On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Joseph Garrett <<a href="mailto:joegarrett@earthlink.net">joegarrett@earthlink.net</a>> wrote: <dl> <dd>Kent said: "Yes, but it appears to be a _good_ web-based system. 8^) And at <dd>least email _replies_ are supported, and from within the Gmail apps, <dd>replies are even more simple. " <dd>Kent, <dd>It's obvious you still don't get it. Any "web -based system" is not going <dd>to cut it! It requires many more "steps" to achieve what we have at <dd>present. AND, it makes most aspects of our current system far more <dd>complicated! I for one, would NEVER participate in that sort of "system"! <dd>It's a pain in the ass, to put it in plain language! <dd>Joe <dd>Joe Garrett, R.P.T. <dd>Captain of the Tool Police <dd>Squares R I </dl> </blockquote></blockquote></html>