<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">Well, Ron, no one would
have to be interested in anybody else's. <br>
<br>
It would be a way to reduce the unmanageable bulk, and to enable <br>
sorting by topic and searchability. <br>
<br>
Susan<br>
</font><br>
Ron Nossaman wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:512E61E4.80403@cox.net" type="cite">On 2/27/2013
1:35 PM, Susan Kline wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Possibly a series of jaunts along Memory
Lane, selecting gems and jewels to
<br>
new files, which would be searchable? Each person investing the time to
do
<br>
this would have their own flavor of archive, kept in their own machine,
and
<br>
possibly also on media for durability.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
This has always been an option for each and every one of us
individually, either as the posts came into our inboxes, or lifted from
the archives on line. I wouldn't be interested in someone elses
compilation of what they considered interesting any more than anyone
else would be interested in mine.
<br>
Ron N
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>