<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: = Arial" bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=rol= e_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2> <DIV> <DIV>  Terry</DIV> <DIV> I agree with your first posts assessment . IN this case It's more= likely that the bridge was cut wrong but ,of course many scenarios are possi= ble. Is there any compression rumpling or ridging in the panel? This would at lea= st indicate that the factory guys dried the panel enough to get it to belly &am= p; support my contention that the bridge is cut wrong. It's really unfathomable to me that they wouldn't have their most experienced belly guys= in the D dept. You Know?</DIV> <DIV>  Yes this is a warranty issue to be taken up immediately</DIV> <DIV>   Dale Erwin</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><= FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size= =2>Michael G.(UK) wrote:<BR><BR><BR>> Hello David Renaud and List<BR>> S&S = "D" year 2002 with rolled bridge? Bridge(s)?!<BR>> This sounds to me ultra serious. What can we learn from this? The problem<BR>> needs exhaustive= ly investigating. In view of the fact that many of us<BR>> re-string such beasts (and I can only think this must be as a direct<BR>result<BR>> of= the original stringing process) what are the pit-falls which could lead<BR>&gt= ; to such a major problem?<BR><BR>Poor belly design, construction, and/or materials.<BR><BR>> By re-capping would not the original problem still<BR>> be present?<BR><BR>Likely, depends on what the original prob= lem is.<BR><BR>Terry Farrell</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>