<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/25/01 10:35:01 AM Central Daylight Time,
<BR>jformsma@dixie-net.com (John M. Formsma) writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">He has violated
<BR>the PTG Code of Ethics--anyone can read that on the back of the membership
<BR>card. This technician should not be allowed to use PTG's name and/or logo if
<BR>he continues to do poor work. If he is allowed, then PTG as a whole suffers.
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR>There must be a blue moon this moth because once again, I am in complete
<BR>agreement with both Jim and Gina and thank them for their comments and
<BR>especially Gina for her contribution to the disciplinary code.
<BR>
<BR>The problem with the above opinion is that the person who did the work
<BR>probably thinks he did a good job. The same with the Steinway grand that
<BR>came up here to a recording studio. The person who did the work thinks he
<BR>did a "great" job and the lady who paid him $$,$$$ for it thought it was fine
<BR>too, until she sent it up to her son, the recording engineer.
<BR>
<BR>Now he is holding the "bag", so to speak because he has an expensive piano
<BR>that is unfit for use and that no technician will touch except to assess for
<BR>how bad it really is and to recommend only that it be completely
<BR>remanufactured.
<BR>
<BR>This is not a matter for PTG Membership to handle. It is between the
<BR>customer and the technician who did the *allegedly* poor work. If the two
<BR>parties disagree, then it is between their attorneys and if they cannot
<BR>resolve the matter, the courts. The only way any technicians, be they PTG
<BR>Members or not, should be involved is if they are asked to give a
<BR>professional assessment or appraisal for which they are paid a fee. They may
<BR>also be asked to give a deposition or testify to their findings in court.
<BR>
<BR>Only if after all of this a judgment is made against the technician might
<BR>there be grounds for PTG action based on its Code of Ethics. Otherwise, PTG,
<BR>whether it be the local Chapter, Committees or the Home Office has no
<BR>business getting involved with the complaint. If it did, it would be putting
<BR>itself in jeopardy, siding with a technician whose *opinion* is that this
<BR>work is substandard.
<BR>
<BR>Terry, the most you can and should do is to write a detailed assessment, take
<BR>photos that support your findings and charge for your time and effort. If
<BR>the customer does not want to pay for what that work is worth, DROP IT!!!
<BR>
<BR>Mind you, I am not defending this technician nor disagreeing with your
<BR>opinion of the work. Anyone who does such poor work will dig his own grave.
<BR>Even if he continues to botch more pianos, the word will get out and his
<BR>enterprise will be self limiting. The piano will end up being junked, sold
<BR>or traded at salvage value. If there eventually is a technician who can get
<BR>it for nearly nothing who wants to start over with it, fine. Otherwise, it
<BR>is old enough to be put to its final rest anyway. Cast iron frames and cut
<BR>out soundboard make great shop decor. Old cases make great flower boxes.
<BR>(Ask Conrad, he knows.)
<BR>
<BR>Suggest to the lady that she take a look at some of those nice new Baldwins
<BR>that are going for such attractive prices.
<BR>
<BR>Bill Bremmer RPT
<BR>Madison, Wisconsin</FONT></HTML>