<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>My training and tendency is to tune pure 2:1 octaves =
in the
last octave. The theory being that the upper note will cause the =
2nd
partial of the lower note to vibrate sympathetically and add to the =
relative
thinness of the last octave. However, I also test the upper =
octaves
by playing an arpeggiated and open minor chord in 1st inversion with the =
top
note representing the doubled 5th of the chord. In other words, if =
you are
testing C7, play Ab4, F5, C6 and C7. C7 being the 5th, =
3rd and
2nd partial respectively of the other three notes. You can
hear immediately if the C7 is a bit flat. So in reality, the =
upper
octaves are stretched. Many concert tuners stretch the upper end =
of the
piano a bit because the piano should feel like it's "taking off" a =
bit as
you go up the scale. Also, because the decay is so fast I think =
the
perception (especially from the back of the hall) is of a flatter =
pitch.
In the more intimate setting of one's living room, I think the =
perception is
different and I would personally aim for a more pure 2:1 keeping in mind =
that
flat is always more offensive than sharp. There are clearly =
different
styles in this arena and I'm sure you will hear differing =
opinions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>David Love </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com
href="mailto:mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com">Farrell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> October 21, 2001 2:53 =
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on this =
temperament
thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Thanks for your comments David. I follow pretty much exactly what =
you
described in your post below when I tune. I usually test some sample =
octaves
all across the keyboard to get a feel for what I will be wanting to do =
with
the DOB. I have all of Jim Coleman's info and have studied it =
extensively.
When I said that I wonder what I should be doing with my octaves, I =
was
referring to the upper treble (as in your original post) and was =
indicating
that I know very little about upper treble stretch theory - why some =
tuners
stretch more than others, why some stretch a big piano on a stage more =
than a
small piano in a home. When techs are talking about these =
various
amounts of stretch, what are they doing with the amount of beating in =
octaves
and double and triple octaves way up in the high treble? Are we =
talking only
about putting a half or a quarter bpm in some type of octave, or lots =
of beats
or what? Any thoughts would be welcome.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry Farrell</DIV>
<DIV> <SPAN id=__#Ath#SignaturePos__></SPAN> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=davidlovepianos@earthlink.net
href="mailto:davidlovepianos@earthlink.net">David Love</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, October 21, =
2001 2:50
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on this =
temperament
thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>As a general rule I am finding that small pianos =
require
an entry of -.5 on the DOB and as the pianos get bigger that number
decreases. But you can measure the stretch before you =
start by
tuning a double octave (after entering the FAC numbers and saving), =
and
testing aurally to see if it is where you want it. The SAT =
uses A4 as
the fixed point so keep that in mind when you choose your test =
double
octave. I usually try and test the double octave to not =
include any
wound strings. If the double octave is too wide, input a =
negative
number on the DOB and change notes (step up, step down) to implement =
the
change. Test again. When you get it where you want it go =
ahead
and start tuning. When tuning with the SAT I start in the =
tenor and go
up (when tuning aurally, I start from the temperament and go =
down).
When I am done with the treble I usually direct tune the bass as the =
machine
sometimes has problems across the break and I don't always agree =
with its
choices for stretch in the bass. Jim Coleman has made several
contributions to the list regarding use of the DOB. I =
recommend you
search the archives and check them out. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>David Love</FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com
href="mailto:mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com">Farrell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> October 21, 2001 =
11:11 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on this =
temperament
thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I would sure like to hear more on this topic. As a tuner =
still on a
steep learning curve, I wonder just what I should be doing with my =
octaves, but I find that the SAT III is either right where I =
wish it
to be, or sometimes I do find that it seems to have calculated a =
tuning
with too much stretch, and I have to enter negative numbers in the =
DOB to
slow the beating down - occasionally quite a bit.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry Farrell <SPAN =
id=__#Ath#SignaturePos__></SPAN> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=davidlovepianos@earthlink.net
href="mailto:davidlovepianos@earthlink.net">David Love</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, October 21, =
2001
11:25 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on this =
temperament thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>My experience suggests that C8 at 43+ is not =
a
conservative stretch but a fairly healthy one. To my ear, =
I
usually reduce the stretch (on the SATIII via the =
DOB).
On concert grands I seem to prefer it a bit under =
40. On smaller grands and uprights, in the mid =
30's.
Of course the general scaling does make a difference. =
But
generally I find the standard setting on a SATIII over
stretches. I am curious what other people =
find.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>David Love</FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: =
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=dm.porritt@verizon.net
href="mailto:dm.porritt@verizon.net">David M. Porritt</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> October 21, 2001 =
7:40
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on =
this
temperament thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Bill:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You've talked quite a bit of your "tempered octaves" but =
as one
who has seen everything from 2:1 octaves to outrageously =
stretched
octaves I don't know what kind of stretch you're talking =
about.
Could you give us some numbers so we can know what you mean by =
tempered octaves? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>For example, when I tune a Steinway D my C6 is stretched =
to 5.06,
C7 is 16.11, and C8 is 43.84. This is what I consider a
conservative tuning. What kind of numbers do you =
get? On
any piano, just measure your C6, 7, & 8 and tell us what =
model
piano it is, and how it stretches with your tempered =
octaves.
That would be very informative.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>dave<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>*********** REPLY =
SEPARATOR
***********<BR><BR>On 10/21/01 at 7:19 AM Billbrpt@AOL.COM
wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: =
#000000 2px solid"><FONT
face=arial,helvetica><FONT size=2>In a message dated =
10/21/01
6:07:55 AM Central Daylight Time, =
davidlovepianos@earthlink.net
(David Love) writes: <BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: =
#0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
TYPE="CITE">That being said, if the pianist needs an =
altered
tuning to create excitement, he should practice
more.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR></FONT><FONT lang=0 face=Arial =
color=#000000
size=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><BR>It's always been my =
belief, as a piano
technician that the better prepared the piano, the better =
equipped
the artist is. Remember that I have not advocated *HT* =
as such
for Jazz. To you, this implies *altered* tuning which =
means
something quite noticeably different and thus creates an
*interference* with what you do rather than provide an =
enhancement.
<BR><BR>I don't know if you can or have tried my EBVT but as =
I have
designed it (with Tempered Octaves), it is meant to enhance =
your
playing, not shock or disturb your musical sensibilities. =
It
is meant to provide definition, texture and clarity, not =
weird,
jarring and shocking dissonances. If the EBVT is still =
to
*altered* for you, I believe you might benefit from the =
Marpurg
(also with my Tempered Octaves system). I will give =
your piano
an uncanny clean, crisp and clear sound but absolutely will =
not
create any distinction between keys. <BR><BR></FONT><FONT =
lang=0
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2 =
FAMILY="SANSSERIF">Bill Bremmer RPT
<BR>Madison, Wisconsin</FONT><FONT size=2
=
Arial></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></FONT><PRE>_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@mail.smu.edu
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE=
></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>