<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Delwin D Fandrich wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><style></style>
<blockquote
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----</div>
<div
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><b>From:</b>
<a href="mailto:Wimblees@AOL.COM" title="Wimblees@AOL.COM">Wimblees@AOL.COM</a></div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org" title="pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</a></div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> May 03, 2002 12:29 PM</div>
<div style="FONT: 10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> Re: improvements</div>
<font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>In a message dated 5/3/02
2:13:44 PM Central Daylight Time, <a href="mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no">Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no</a>
writes:</font></font>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
TYPE="CITE"><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>That
tells me that even they are not</font></font>
<br><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>> > satisfied</font></font>
<br><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>> > with what the have been
building, and need to improve.</font></font>
<br><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>></font></font>
<br><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>> Well, computers improve,
cars improve, medicines improve, why not pianos?</font></font>
<br><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>> les b</font></font>
<br><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>> houston</font></font>
<br> </blockquote>
<p><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>You mean like "THE NEW AND
IMPROVED MODEL M, THIS WEEK ONLY.</font></font>
<p><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>Wim</font></font> </blockquote>
<font face="Lucida Sans"><font color="#000080"><font size=+0>Or, how about
the new and improved Model M with a cleaner, clearer bass, a smoother bass/tenor
crossover, an improved upper tenor/lower treble, a cleaner treble and consistent
action geometry?</font></font></font> <font face="Lucida Sans"><font color="#000080"><font size=+0>Who
knows? It might sell better even without the hype.</font></font></font> <font face="Lucida Sans"><font color="#000080"><font size=+0>Del</font></font></font> </blockquote>
<p><br>These puter quotes are just great arent they.... Not a word of the
above post from "<font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>a message dated
5/3/02 2:13:44 PM Central Daylight Time, <a href="mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no">Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no</a>
writes:" </font></font>is mine...
<p>but as long as you rebroughtup the subject.... which Model M would that
be ??... As for whether it would sell better or not... maybe.. but then
in a world where 98.6 % of the existing pianists dont know that there
is another temperament then ET, and the other 12 % dont know what a temperament
is in the first place, and Wim is in the shower getting felt debri tickled
....er... removed from his belly button.... you have to wonder.
<p>Perhaps I ate to many brown beans tonite.
<p>--
<br>Richard Brekne
<br>RPT, N.P.T.F.
<br>Bergen, Norway
<br><A HREF="mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no">mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no</A>
<br><A HREF="http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html">http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html</A>
<br>
</body>
</html>