<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><!--StartFragment --><FONT =
face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><PRE><FONT face="Eras Medium ITC" size=4>Hi =
people,</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Eras Medium ITC" size=4>I'm =
trying to hone my aural tuning skills and I've come up with a method... =
</FONT></PRE><PRE><FONT face="Eras Medium ITC" size=4>I'd like to =
hear others' feedback on this particular method, </FONT><FONT =
face="Eras Medium ITC" size=4>and about any other kinds of methods =
you might recommend.
Today I had a nice tuning in a quiet house. It was a Yamaha Grand, a
C3 in good shape. So I took the opportunity to "keep score" on my
aural tuning. I used Potter F-A II.
What I did was:
1. Take F-A-C readings and let the SAT calculate a tuning.
2. Set the A4 with the machine.
3. Tune the temperament by ear from there.
4. Compare my note with the machine's calculation.
5. Write down how far off I was (in cents).
6. Re-tune with machine and go to the next note, lather, rinse and
repeat.
Here's my scorecard:
A3: -.1
F3: -.2
F4: +.9
C#4: -.8
D4: dead on!
A#3: -2.7, retried: -2.2. Found out D4 (where I was tuning the third
from had drifted flat - gotta work on my stability!)
F#3: -.5
D#4: dead on!
B3: -2.8 (oops!) retry: dead on!
G3: +.2
E4: -.4
C4: dead on!
G#3: -.8
F#4: -.1
G4: dead on
G#4: -.3
So howzzat? Not too bad, I'm thinking. My tendency looks to be that
I tend to tune flat (slower beating), but I think I'll need a few more
scorecards to make a statistical judgement. And I have to work on the
stability thing, too, obviously. I get so caught up in the beat
speeds that I lose track of that fundamental skill of setting the
string and the pin.
Are any of you doing practice things with your ETDs? How do you use =
them?</FONT></PRE></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>