<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; = charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Hi Roger,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Why would you want to = do the job twice? I have always found, (Yamaha training you know), levelling using = either approach is extremely accurate. But to do one, then the other, is most inefficient...at least in my opinion, and of those whom I worked under = in the factory.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Bob = Moffatt</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> </DIV> <DIV> <HR> </DIV></FONT> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">Hi = Terry,<BR>          &nb= sp;    For the most stable job. Major leveling. I use the split punchings. = After completion I remove the stack and replace them with uncut = punchings.  Save the split punchings for the next job.  <BR><BR>You may find = you have to install a few thin onion skin split punchings, but this is just a = small refinement.</DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3><BR>Regards = Roger</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>