<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: = Arial" bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=rol= e_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2> <DIV> <DIV>  <FONT size=3>Susan</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3>  Maple is very hard but also porous so this should= be expected.  Anything one can do to solidify the pin in the bridge will h= elp reduce falseness & conserve tonal energy. I'd use epoxy if the pin is ou= t & I had the time. It fills more & is harder.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3>  Dale</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><= FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size= =2>Hi, Dale <BR><BR>What do you think of slacking off a warbler treble string, pulling= out the pin if it's willing to come, and putting the CA into the hole -- versu= s just putting a drop at the bass of the pin without changing the wire? Any benefits to getting more CA into the bridge? Worth the time and tuning stability expended?<BR><BR>I did this once on a few notes of (an unnamed b= ut fairly new) grand with tuning stability issues, and found that when I put = CA glue down one hole and put the bridge pin back in, CA spurted out of a neighboring hole. Obviously, there can be cracks down there ... <BR><BR>Su= san <BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>