<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {margin-right:0in;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle20
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap: =
break-word;
-khtml-nbsp-mode: space;-khtml-line-break: after-white-space'>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>I was thinking mostly about the =
balance
between power, sustain and tonal range. The trend seems to be moving =
in the
direction of power, loudness, attack, whatever you want to call it. =
For those
who wish to move the balance back to one of more sustain with a natural =
dynamic
range somewhat lower on the scale, that trend—and what people have =
gotten
used to—makes it difficult to put the piano back in pianoforte. =
Many instruments
now are just fortes and if they don’t produce that kind of sound, =
many
people are disappointed because that’s what they’ve grown
accustomed to hearing. </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>A broader tonal palette might, =
ironically,
mean a reduction in loudness. </span></font></p>
<div>
<p><font size=2 color=navy face="Times New Roman"><span =
style='font-size:10.0pt;
color:navy'>David Love<br>
davidlovepianos@comcast.net </span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 =
face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original =
Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> =
pianotech-bounces@ptg.org
[mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] <b><span =
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf
Of </span></b>Bec and John<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Friday, July 01, =
2005 7:34
PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> Pianotech<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: =
Predictability and
Change. Was RE: Franz Mohr</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Hi David,</span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Sorry for the delayed reply. I definitely =
agree with
what you're saying - more often than not people become comfortable with =
what
they're used to and resist changing from that - of course that can =
always work
in reverse, if one is used to the "new" piano designs going =
back to
"old" may just be a simple case of resisting change =
:-)</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Though I think many performing pianists are =
used to a
variety of pianos with differing sounds - good and bad. It's hard =
to
dismiss a pianists' opinion on a newly designed piano solely on this =
basis (not
that you are). Personally, had I not known there was anything =
different
about the piano in the Overs' recording I would have just thought =
"Oh,
what a nice piano", not "Behold the saviour of stagnant piano
design".</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>In the case I was bringing up - my favourite =
piano
recording vs. the Overs recording - I have had surprisingly little =
experience
with Steinways compared to other pianos and I *loved* the quality of =
that piano
long before I knew it was a Steinway. I only bought my Steinway a year =
ago, and
previously was practising on mostly Baldwins for 8 years =
prior.</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Something occurred to me though today =
when
considering the re-working of instruments to use new designs. Many =
pianists who
own an ageing instrument or problematic one are delighted when work =
is
done to restore the tone. Is it not possible that the delight of =
the
customers you guys do work for are perhaps delighted because of the =
quality of
work you guys to the piano in general, rather than the changes =
themselves? Even
a properly prepped piano can have a big impact on someone used to =
non-prepped
or poorly functioning pianos. Also, plenty of people are ecstatic =
to get
their old Steinway rebuilt from the factory, to probably what is less =
quality
in workmanship and parts than what their pianos were when =
new.</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>- John</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
<br>
</span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><span =
class=apple-style-span><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:navy'><span style='border-spacing: 0px =
0px;text-align:auto;-khtml-text-decorations-in-effect: none;
-apple-text-size-adjust: auto;orphans: 2;widows: 2;word-spacing:0px'>It =
seems
to me that a lot of what we like is what we are used to. The
“whump” of a Steinway in the mid tenor we learn to identify =
as
depth when in reality it may be a belly with ribs that can’t quite =
support
the crown or stiffness necessary for that section and a predictable =
transition
from bass to treble. The pop in the attack that we learn to look for =
in the
treble may be more to do with the failure of the killer octave =
region. But
when you are accustomed to hearing such things on a piano that you =
identify as
the “crème de la crème” then when it’s missing, it =
seems like
there’s something wrong. The difficulty is in wiping the slate =
clean and
approaching the instrument without bias. As one pianist said to me =
the other
day (to paraphrase): “most of what pianists look for is =
predictability;
as long a what comes out of the piano is what the pianist thinks will =
comes out
before they play a note, then everything else can be worked =
out.” Well I
think that goes for what pianists expect within an instrument as well as
between instruments. And if they are used to hearing the same things =
over and
over, it’s very difficult to break that pattern of predictability =
even if
the heretofore unpredictable piano has better balance, smoother =
transitions and
a better combination of sustain and power. Change is always an uphill =
battle. <O:P style="color: rgb(0, 0, 128); font-family: Arial; =
font-size: 13.3333px; "></O:P></span></font></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><span =
class=apple-style-span><O:P style="color: rgb(0, 0, 128); =
font-family: Arial; font-size: 13.3333px; "><font
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:navy'> </O:P></span></font></span></p>
<div>
<p style='margin-left:.5in'><span class=apple-style-span><font =
size=2
color=navy face="Times New Roman"><span =
style='font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'>David
Love</span></font></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span></div>
</body>
</html>