<html>
<body>
<br>
At 01:07 AM 3/18/2003 -0700, you (David Nereson,) wrote: <br>
>Isn't the content of this list monitored, and edited at least for the
<br>
>archives? <br><br>
David Skolnik replied:<br>
>We'll save Andy at least one email chore...the answer is NO to
<br>
>both. Maybe it's time. <br><br>
At 10:13 PM 3/18/2003 +0100, Richard Brekne wrote:<br>
>Course the problem is, and has always been, how to make this just.
Given the nature of the many forms of disagreements I find it difficult
to believe at >best that monitoring can be fairly achieved unless
several people are involved. <br><br>
<br>
David Skolnik now writes:<br><br>
First of all, it's not even a workable idea, and I never really meant to
suggested it. Possibly, however, there could be a kind of sub-list, that
people consciously post all the non-technical messages to.Those who
wanted to enter into the OT discourse would do so voluntarily. If
such a list were available, what would be the excuse for someone to post
OT to the technical list? Such behavior would appear more intentionally
disruptive. I'm trying an experiment, over the next few days: I'm
separating the day's list mail into TECHNICAL and NON-TECHNICAL
mailboxes. (I use Eudora). Then I can see the proportion of each,
and it gives me an idea of what such lists as I just described would look
like. Why not try it yourself?<br><br>
This would not mean to preclude any personal (OT) statements within
the an individual technical posting, however, if someone were to wish to
<u>respond </u>to the personal (OT) aspect, that would go to the
sub-list. For example, if, you were to pretend that this posting
was technical in nature, and I were to make some comment, in passing,
about the looming war, any response, specific to that sentiment, would be
directed to the sub-list. While it may seem contrived, think of it
this way: We're all in a bar (smoking / non-smoking?). In a
large, back room, is a table, around which sit people (mostly sober)
discussing various technical issues. In the front room, people are
hanging out, talking about, whatever. If a discussion in the back
room begins to digress, or get uncivil, the participants get up and take
it to the front room. If the exchange becomes too distractive, even
for the front room, they need to take it outside (private, elsewhere,
etc).<br><br>
Of course, any attempt to impose a conceptualized structure on an organic
entity (the list) feels like genetic engineering. You don't know
what the repercussions might be.<br><br>
<br>
David Skolnik<br>
Hastings-On-Hudson<br><br>
<br>
</body>
</html>