<html>
At 06:15 PM 6/14/02 -0700, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>
Roger, Thanks. I like the idea of drawing the line, that would give you
an exact reference point and can always be taken off with a stroke or two
of sandpaper. </font></blockquote><br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>
What I'm curious about is, are you talking about setting each section
separately?</font></blockquote><br>
Hi Kevin,<br>
All two frequently the tray bows down from either side of the
pitman. So setting the timing with the hammers is accurate to the touch
component. You then have to shim the tray felt to even out the
pedal timing if there is a bow. This gets back to what I have been
preaching about sequence. Hope this clarifies the point.<br><br>
<font face="arial" size=2> Other than that, I don't see your
methods really differing from mine very much. Someone suggested replacing
the key end felt, and of course you should do that on pianos that have
seen some wear. <br><br>
I am not slow in recommending changing both tray and key end felt, so
that I am in the ball park to start with. The job always seems a fudge
with worn felt, remember the timing also changes with the unicorda
pedal with worn key end felt.<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite> Speaking of
Baldwin; you're a dealer, why don't they ever even think about
"damper timing"? In fact, I learned how to do a real good job-
real quick, just because of them. God Bless 'em for that.
</font></blockquote><br><br>
We are working on improvements in that area.<br><br>
regards Roger<br><br>
</html>