<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" = xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; = charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10"> <meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 10"> <link rel=File-List href="cid:filelist.xml@01C45063.B8770A10"> <o:SmartTagType = namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="time"/> <o:SmartTagType = namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="date"/>  <style>  </style>  </head> <body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple = style='tab-interval:.5in'> <div class=Section1>   I’ve used both Tunelab & RCT and prefer Tunelab. = Pitch-raises are accomplished faster with TL (IMO) by being able to see the pitch of = individual strings of a unison without using mutes. I also like being able to set = the type of real-world octaves I tune as 4-2 or 6-3, or whatever instead of the = various “Octave tuning styles” that RCT uses. With TL, one can choose the sample = notes used to create a tuning curve and then modify the resultant curve if desired. = The split-scale mode often produces a useable tuning across bass/tenor = breaks with large jumps in inharmonicity that would otherwise be impossible. In the = low bass where some partials are difficult for the machine to hear, you can = easily switch to another, more audible partial. You can also download and try = the program before you buy it, and if you do buy it you save substantial $$. =  <o:p></o:p>   I haven’t tried Verituner. Although it sounds like a great = device I like having my schedule and complete customer database available to me = on the same 7 oz Pocket PC that runs TL!<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> - Mark<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> -----Original = Message----- From: Steve Martin [mailto:smartin@dodo.com.au] Sent: = <st1:date Month="6" Day="11" Year="2004">Friday, June 11, = 2004</st1:date> <st1:time Hour="15" Minute="17">3:17 PM</st1:time> To: pianotech@ptg.org Subject: Electronic = tuners!? <o:p> </o:p> <div> Hello = everyone<o:p></o:p> </div> <div>  <o:p></o:p> </div> <div> i'd be almost sure that = there is a thread somewhere in the archives regarding ETD's so can anyone point me = to it or give me some current advice? <o:p></o:p> </div> <div> I was thinking of buying probably the Cybertuner software - do any list members use = this, are there any downfalls to the program and is there anything else = comparable?? I have heard a lot of people talk very favourably about = Cybertuner.<o:p></o:p> </div> <div>  <o:p></o:p> </div> <div> thanks,<o:p></= o:p> </div> <div>  <o:p></o:p> </div> <div> Steve = Martin.<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> </body> </html>