<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER=
-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none">
<P><BR>By the way, Dean Reyburn says his Cybertuner gets 100% on the PT=
G tuning test also. </P>
<P>David Ilvedson</P>
<P><BR><BR> </P>
<DIV style="PADDING-RIGHT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 5p=
x; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 3px solid; PADDING-TOP: 5px">
<HR>
Original message<BR>From: "Horace Greeley" <HGREELEY@STANFORD.EDU><BR>T=
o: ilvey@sbcglobal.net, Pianotech <PIANOTECH@PTG.ORG><BR>Received: 9/12=
/2005 8:31:31 PM<BR>Subject: Re: David Ilvedson/SAT Tuning Test Scores<=
BR><BR>
<P align=left>At 07:39 PM 9/12/2005, you wrote:<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">So I just checked with=
Michael Kimbell, our San Francisco CTE and tuning examiner and he conc=
urred with my statement. </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>That is, after al=
l, what it was designed to do.<BR><BR>Horace<BR><BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">David Ilvedson<BR><BR>=
<HR>
Original message<BR>From: "Joe Garrett" <BR>To: pianotech <BR>Received:=
9/12/2005 4:52:45 PM<BR>Subject: Re: David Ilvedson/SAT Tuning Test Sc=
ores<BR><BR><FONT size=2>David Ilvedson said: "</FONT><FONT face="T=
imes New Roman, Times">Somewhat lack it may be but SAT III will always =
get a 100% score on PTG=<BR> tuning test...not too bad a place t=
o begin. Not the stability part of=<BR> the test though...=
that's the tuner totally..."<BR><BR>David,<BR>Where, pray tell, did you=
glean that Preposterous Idea! Not even! Check with Tuning Examiners, b=
efore you make such a wild claim! Please?<G><BR>J</FONT><FONT siz=
e=2>oe Garrett, R.P.T.<BR>Captain, Tool Police<BR>Squares R I</FONT><=
/BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BODY></HTML>