<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>HTML Message</TITLE> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER= -LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none">List, I tried a ne= w set of keytops, for me, today...Kluge.  I usually use Schaf= f's keytops...the Kluge were in connected sets of 7...C through B.&nbsp= ;  Right off the bat I had to break the sets apart, which was a pa= in...in fact until I figured out the secret (carefully break from the t= ail until down to the front, then bend/break in that plane), I broke on= e front and had to carefully fit that together when gluing...after that= I found (opposite of the Schaff keytops) that the keytop front didnt' = want to adhere to the front of the key...in other words it didn't have = any inherent pressure towards the key's front surface.   With= the Schaff, the angle of the keytop front made the adhesion good but t= ended to push the keytop up at the top front area and I'd get separatio= n unless I clamped.   The Kluge keytop fronts are apparently = at 90 degrees to the top.  I ended up using blue painters tape to = come from the key button stretched across the keytop and over the front= and underneath the key to apply pressure and keep the front against th= e keys front surface...I hope this is clear?   At first I did= nt' like the difference but in retrospect I didn't have to clamp the ke= ys, the blue tape did the trick... Anyone else have any comments= about Kluge...whatever... David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, = California </BODY></HTML>