<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; = charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV>If you are going to pull the pin, I = would recommend putting unthickened epoxy down the hole - it's no more difficult = than CA, and I can only assume the epoxy will provide more benefit - although I = have not made any comparison test between the two. I have epoxied many a pin in = place. I routinely use epoxy (West System) in every pin hole on a new bridge = also.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Terry Farrell</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">What do you think of slacking off a warbler treble string, pulling out the = pin if it's willing to come, and putting the CA into the hole -- versus just = putting a drop at the bass of the pin without changing the wire? Any benefits = to getting more CA into the bridge? Worth the time and tuning stability expended? I did this once on a few notes of (an unnamed but = fairly new) grand with tuning stability issues, and found that when I put CA glue = down one hole and put the bridge pin back in, CA spurted out of a neighboring = hole. Obviously, there can be cracks down there ... Susan At = 01:22 AM 8/5/2005 -0400, you wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">    Susan     yes & Perhaps  wee bit more craftsmanship at the factory.  The = list of complaints seems to be getting longer   Dale <DL> <DD>At 01:07 PM 8/4/2005 -0500, Andrew wrote: <DD>>A number of single strings in the high treble were = warbling.  Tried gentle <DD>>seating of strings and pins to very little = effect. <DD>Possibly putting a drop of CA glue at the base of the front = bridge pins? <DD>For warblers, that is. </DD></DL> </BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>