<HTML>In a message dated 6/6/02 5:22:52 PM Central Daylight Time, pianotuna@accesscomm.ca (Don) writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">How can your comment be seen as constructive or helpful to the orginal thread Bill? </BLOCKQUOTE> The point is that your insistence on this "full disclosure" malarkey, something entirely made up in your own mind, would not have merely been inappropriate, it would have been counterproductive and downright absurd. Do all the people who tune Reverse Well as their own personal alternative to ET *fully disclose* that fact?  Are *all* of your tunings really *equal*, *all* the time?  When they aren't, do you *fully disclose* that fact? Piano tuning is an art.  Therefore, certain information can and should remain confidential, subject to the discretion of the professional piano technician. If you think there should be some kind of rule about this, then try to get it passed through council.  It would never happen because it is an absurd idea.  So absurd, that if it ever did happen, I would proudly be the very first person to violate it. Bill Bremmer RPT Madison, Wisconsin <A HREF="http://www.billbremmer.com/">Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . c o m =-</A> </HTML>