<HTML>In a message dated 4/19/02 7:29:59 AM Central Daylight Time, mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Aren't there any ladies reading who are going to take issue with this horribly sexist post! Shame on you Wim! Oops, did I just make one myself?   ;-) Terry Farrell  </BLOCKQUOTE> Terry I personally do not see my post as being sexist. I see it as a fact. MOSTLY  housewives read a "shopper". MOSTLY men read the paper. I didn't say only housewives or only men. That would have been sexist. BUT, if any women, or men, are offended by what I said, I apologize. Wim <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">----- Original Message ----- From: <Wimblees@AOL.COM> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:13 PM Subject: Re: advertising > In a message dated 4/18/02 10:36:02 AM Central Daylight Time, > pianowrmonroe@hotmail.com writes: > > > > I once took out an ad in the Services section of the Salt Lake Tribune (Huge > > > > Local "shopper" type papers are better than the big newspaper. The shoppers > get read mostly by housewives, who look for bargains and coupons. The big > paper gets read mostly by men for the news, sports and business. > > Wim > </BLOCKQUOTE> </HTML>