<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I think you've really lost all perspective in =
this. Good
luck.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>David Love</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Billbrpt@AOL.COM =
href="mailto:Billbrpt@AOL.COM">Billbrpt@AOL.COM</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> February 21, 2002 5:34 =
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Equal Temperament, =
Oh
really, what else is news?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT size=2>In a =
message dated
2/21/02 6:57:53 PM Central Standard Time, <A
=
href="mailto:davidlovepianos@earthlink.net">davidlovepianos@earthlink.n=
et</A>
(David Love) writes: <BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
TYPE="CITE">It's unfortunate that the discussion can't take place =
without so
much vitriol and politics.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>What vitriol and =
which
politics? Maybe in your mind, yes. Anteres really believes =
that
"most" tuners tune in ET and I don't. I have plenty of =
experience
and evidence to formulate my basis for my beliefs. This is not =
the first
time I've been called "Don Quixote". I harly think that is a =
reason to
change my point of view or the way I present it. I also happen =
to like
the book and the musical and will be doing a number from that show in =
an
upcoming performance. Anyone can write whatever they want about =
ET and
it is acceptable but trying to argue against commonly held beliefs is =
seen as
"ranting and raving", regardless of the tone. <BR><BR>And thanks for =
you
contribution, Conrad, it really does put things into a nice =
perspective.
I already know what most of the world thinks about this and why =
they
think what they do. What you would have me do after the least =
bit of
argument is to go away and hide. Then it wouldn't be vitriolic =
and
political because your line of thinking would have prevailed. =
But so
long as I continue to write about what I think is important and =
relevant, it
bothers you. <BR><BR>You have a choice, don't read it. But =
because you
do and you engage in argument or discussion, it means that you are =
troubled by
what you fear may really be true but don't want to admit. =
Therefore,
your best defense is an offense, an attempt to put it down. <BR><BR>I =
double
dare this CTE guy to put forth his research which shows what he thinks =
it
does. It will be about as firmly founded as the "Scientific =
Creationism"
teachings are that try to prove that the Christian Bible's every word =
can be
taken literally. If you want to believe that ET always was and =
always
will be, it's up to you. I, for one, believe just the opposite.
<BR><BR>Bill Bremmer RPT <BR>Madison, Wisconsin <BR><A
href="http://www.billbremmer.com/">Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b =
r e m m e r
. c o m =-</A> </FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>