<html>
Zen -<br>
This is the post I was about to send before reading your response to
Patrick. It was written with the vision of a grand, not upright
piano. I decided to send it to you anyway, in the event that there
might still be some validity in it.<br><br>
At 12:34 PM 02/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>Hi
Everyone --</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Yesterday was one of those days. I was
called in by a church to try to tune a piano that was notorious for not
staying in tune. </font></blockquote><br>
<font face="arial">It sounds as though you were familiar with the
instrument's reputation without having previously seen it. Do you
know other technicians whom you respect that have attempted
unsuccessfully to deal with it? Do you know who did the previous
work? <br><br>
<br>
</font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2> What
I found was all of the tuning pins standing so high in the pinblock that
the bottoms of the coils were 10mm from the surface of the plate.
You read right -- 10mm, or 3/10 of an inch. (Yes, I shot pictures
of this, but I still have to get the film developed. No, I didn't
swear out loud, but it wouldn't surprise me if others before me
had.)</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Pin torque was all over the map. Some
pins turned smoothly and didn't pose serious problems in being set.
</font></blockquote><br>
Does this mean that, in spite of the coil height, you felt confident in
your ability to control the pin and string? What was the
torque, or, a la Larudee, 'up and down torque'? <br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2> Others
were murderously tight. </font></blockquote><br>
Torque?<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2> Only
one was bordering on loose. </font></blockquote><br>
Torque?<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2> What
I'm wondering is, will pounding these pins to a proper height help bring
about some sort of uniformity of torque or will it make the tight ones
tighter still?</font></blockquote><br>
Why would you think that tapping in acceptable pins, and very tight pins,
and a loose pin, would make them all feel the same? To my mind the
only reason for tapping pins is to create more torque for otherwise loose
pins, of which you seem to have but one. Yes, coil heights evenly
within the proscribed range is a desirable condition, but if the price
for this consistency is unmanageable and inconsistent torque, it seems a
pyrrhic victory. If many of the pins were already "murderously
tight", where will further tapping take you on the Guild Approved
Adverbial Scale? <br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>Concerning
the tight pins -- does anyone know of any cute tricks for slightly easing
that tightness? I'm going to work on getting authorization to do
the pin-pounding job, and I'd like to be able to leave some semblence of
consistency of pin torque when I'm done.</font></blockquote><br>
Why? Do you need this particular job? What if you were
convinced that the only way to make the piano acceptably tunable was, as
Del mentioned, replacing pinblock? Would the Church Elders go for
it? If not, why would you waste your time, effort, and good name
attempting to correct someone else's mistake? <br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>Any
insights would be greatly appreciated. </font></blockquote><br>
Don't do what I did.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2> Thank
you.</font><br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Z! Reinhardt RPT<br>
Ann Arbor MI<br>
<a href="mailto:diskladame@provide.net">diskladame@provide.net</a></font></blockquote><br><br>
</html>