<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; = charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)"> <title>Message</title> <style>  </style> </head> <body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue> <div class=Section1> Indeed, I’ve heard many sing = the praises of TuneLab, so I would never go so far as to say it’s a = bad software package.  I read in the archives that tests were done in = which it was found that even though one is technically more accurate than the = other, the difference wasn’t noticed in the finished = product.   I guess I would agree with jeannie, = that in my case, RCT worked better “for me”.  I tried the = trial version of TuneLab, and didn’t like the way it looked as a program (layout, visuals, intuitiveness, etc.).  As a geek, these things = are more important to me than anything else.  So knowing that both programs = work fine if you know how to use them, it becomes I guess simply a matter of = finding the right one for you.   Jonathan Finger = RPT   -----Original = Message----- From: = pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of Jeannie Grassi Sent: Sunday, March 30, = 2003 8:00 PM To: 'Pianotech' Subject: RE: Pocket = PC   <div> Alan, </div> <div> OK, you caught me.  I = should have qualified my statement by saying it was the only way to go = "for me."  It seems more intuitive to use, more user friendly, and = the visual was far easier for me.  It it worth the extra money for me = to have a tool that has such ease of use.  TuneLab seems to work fine for many....I needed something different. </div> <div>   </div> <div> jeannie </div> <blockquote = style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> -----Original Message----- From: = pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of tune4u@earthlink.net Sent: Sunday, March 30, = 2003 1:17 PM To: Pianotech Subject: RE: Pocket = PC <div> Okay, having made such a strong endorsement: Why is RCT "the way to go" vs. Tunelab Pocket? The only real difference I can see is a HUGE price = difference. </div> <div>   </div> <div> Alan Barnard </div> <div> Salem, MO </div> <blockquote = style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> -----Original Message----- From: = pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]On = Behalf Of Jeannie Grassi Sent: Sunday, March 30, = 2003 11:02 AM To: 'Dave Foster'; = 'Pianotech' Subject: RE: Pocket = PC <div> Dave, </div> <div> In my opinion there is no comparison.  RCT is by far the way to go!  You won't regret = it.  Dell is offering really great deals on their PDAs right now.  I = don't know how long they will have such good prices. </div> <div>   </div> <div> jeannie </div> <div>   </div> <div> Jeannie Grassi, RPT Associate Editor, Piano Technicians Journal <a = href="mailto:jgrassi@silverlink.net">mailto:jgrassi@silverlink.net</a> = </div> <blockquote = style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> -----Original Message----- From: = pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of Dave Foster Sent: Thursday, March 27, = 2003 6:50 PM To: pianotech@ptg.org Subject: Pocket = PC <div> List, hopefully this summer = I will upgrading (in my opinion ungrading) to a Pocket PC ETD.  I have = some experience with TuneLab, and absolutly no knowledge of the Reyburn Cybertuner.  I'm sure this has been a subject of many discussions, = and I apologize for the repetition of this topic, but what are some of the advantages/disadvantages of one or the other?  I would like to find = out some of your opinions of these programs and what might your = recommendations be. </div> <div> I will be testing and = playing around with these programs in the upcoming MARC in Pittsburgh, and I would like = to know a bit more about them so that I don't look at them = unknowingly. </div> <div>   </div> <div> Dave = Foster </div> <div>   </div> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </div> </body> </html>