<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=rol=
e_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> Hi Paul</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> I haven't' seen or heard this piano but I ca=
n
guess at its' limited potential but never the less, enjoyed the
logical way you considered all things pertinent to your clients needs =
,
acted accordingly & presented him with a much improved version of a
basically low line Yamaha. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> Your end results was a happy client w=
ho is
now creating a more musical outcome than he would if just a hit & run tu=
ning
had been done & more folks were able to particiapate in the actual
production & enjoyment of real music. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> That's what this list aspires to promote</FONT></=
DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> Good stuff</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> Dale Erwin</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><=
FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=
=2>I feel
moved to speak up for the Yamaha GA-1. Been tuning one for a <BR>young (32=
)
pianist - no room, etc. but it's what he has at this time, <BR>for about 5=
years now. I've seen it for a couple years; only eased the <BR>keys and di=
d
gross accupuncture on the hammers, oh yeah, there was some <BR>reshaping
and<BR>string voicing, but pretty much rough-and-ready approach, to save t=
ime
<BR>and money.<BR><BR>So, he is very pleased I've made it into some kind o=
f
musical <BR>instrument. In fact, he invited a few friends over for a=
n
afternoon <BR>concert (the friends turned out to be some other pianists, a=
recording <BR>studio owner and an opera singer). What can I say? This arti=
st
found <BR>tone and touch to serve his requirements in performing for his
<BR>colleagues. The recording studio guy said my tuning was perfect and
<BR>very stable, and very musical. Much was said regarding the beauty and
<BR>content that was revealed.<BR><BR>Stability? Of course it has standard=
tuning problems for that size and <BR>design, could no doubt be improved b=
y
changing a few strings near the <BR>break, etc. but as I tuned it I found =
the
tuning of a month earlier was <BR>still playable and out of tune only as m=
uch
as the weather should have <BR>accounted for. What more can you ask of suc=
h an
instrument?<BR><BR>In short, nobody involved takes it for other than what =
it
is; but it is <BR>still worthy of serious music making by and for serious
musicians who <BR>love music.<BR><BR>the Bass? Of course it's compromised,=
a
lot! But the bass did have <BR>harmonic content that did integrate with th=
e
treble so that additional <BR>harmonic voices spoke. OF COURSE it doesn't
sound like a C7, but <BR>honestly, a Steinway L's bass adds some 'singing'=
that's really <BR>necessary compromise, compared to a D. There can be a bi=
t of
changing <BR>gears about what one recognizes in what one hears; and it's n=
ot
<BR>altogether different with the<BR>ever so modest GA-1.<BR><BR>Of course=
a
great tuning helps, invites ever so much more singing, but <BR>that's not =
the
topic of the moment.<BR><BR>And of course the pianist will be thrilled to =
have
a larger, better <BR>instrument, but it's not so deadly obvious this GA-1 =
has
to be <BR>discarded as worthless<BR>because it's just not
musical.<BR><BR>-Paul Bailey (who probably would have advised looking at a=
very small <BR>Kawai if I'd been consulted)</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>