<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html>   Richard Moody wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>  > Sometimes there are discrepancies between original cents and modern "adjustments".   I am curious to know which source you used for Ellis#4, if from Helmholtz, then which Ellis#4.  Most important, what cents offsets did you use?</blockquote> I used the offsets posted on this list that we all aggreed on that I should use. Ron Koval is useing that same set. It is consistant with the RCT offsets. <blockquote TYPE=CITE>    The cents offsets is necessary to determine if  the whole scale has merely been adjusted to produce A44x or if this adjustment to A=0  inadvertently changes the "key center" from C to A?   <a href="https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives"></a> </blockquote> What can I say... as far as RCT is capable of providing an adequate HT, then this was tuned. It came out exactly the same thing when I compared to my own manually created curves in TuneLab in which the offsets were manually entered after the curve was constructed.   I am also going to read in the Jorgensen book about this tuning if its there, and see if there are good ear tests to confirm its correctness. But all in all... I gotta think its at least close enough to serve the purpose for this first little test we are doing. RicB   -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway <A HREF="mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no">mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no</A> <A HREF="http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html">http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html</A>  </html>