<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; = charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1491" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Agree. No need for DAG. It's yucky and messy. And keeping things clean, lets that quarter-sawn-medula-ray = beauty shine through!</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Terry Farrell</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="cid:004101c53274$bcbd87e0$fbb62341@youro0kwkw9jwc" = align=baseline border=0></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV><FONT face=Arial = size=2>> > Sooooo, no surface dressing on your bridges?  How finely = sanded?  You find<BR>> > it eliminates the need for DAG or the = like?<BR>> > <BR>> > Respectfully,<BR>> > William R. Monroe<BR>> = <BR>> <BR>> There never was a need for Dag, graphite, or any other sort of = <BR>> lubricant on bridge tops. Making them black does make it easier to = <BR>> see where you are when notching though.<BR>> Ron N</FONT></BODY></HTML>