<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV>David:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I don't separate them.  My filter is a simple one.  If it came from any "ptg.org" address it goes in one folder, all others go to the main folder.  </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'm using a program called Calypso that I like a lot, but it is now an orphan.  The company that sold it is no longer in the email business.  Someday I'll have to replace it, but it still does all I need it to do.  I just don't want to use the famous virus magnet for email.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>dave *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 3/11/2003 at 6:47 AM David Skolnik wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid"> David P - At 11:22 AM 3/10/2003 -0600, you wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">David (Skolnik)- He didn't do anything wrong.  He posted his message TO: Pianotech and CC: caut.  Even the people who got it only on the caut list, would probably get the "reply to" as the pianotech list.</BLOCKQUOTE> You're right... and not. The ONLY feature distinguishing the two addresses IS the "Reply To" line, as illustrated below.  Perhaps in asking my question, I should have avoided using "wrong".  I notice that you are subscribed to both PIANOTECH and CAUT.  If I may ask, how does your email program separate mail from these two lists?  As I said in my previous post, I have not yet been able to create such a filter in Eudora. Cross posting can be useful, at times, when wider distribution of an issue is seen as desirable, however, it can also create problems, such as multiple messages for those of us who subscribe to both (or all three) lists, or generate parallel, disconnected discussions.  It's a fairly minor irritant, as it doesn't happen that often, but a question, nonetheless.    Thanks. David Skolnik <BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:03:37 -0600 From: Conrad Hoffsommer <hoffsoco@martin.luther.edu> Subject: prepped piano HELP! (xlist) Sender: caut-bounces@ptg.org X-Sender: hoffsoco@pop.luther.edu To: pianotech@ptg.org Cc: mpt@philbondi.com, caut@ptg.org Reply-to: College and University Technicians <caut@ptg.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 X-BeenThere: caut@ptg.org X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Original-recipient: rfc822;davidskolnik@optonline.net </BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:03:37 -0600 From: Conrad Hoffsommer <hoffsoco@martin.luther.edu> Subject: prepped piano HELP! (xlist) Sender: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org X-Sender: hoffsoco@pop.luther.edu To: pianotech@ptg.org Cc: mpt@philbondi.com, caut@ptg.org Reply-to: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 X-BeenThere: pianotech@ptg.org X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Original-recipient: rfc822;davidskolnik@optonline.net </BLOCKQUOTE> <BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  *********** On 3/10/2003 at 9:33 AM David Skolnik wrote: >Judging from the responses that Conrad received on PIANOTECH, but not on >CAUT, I must assume that his attempt to cross post, to both lists, >failed.   The only difference I found between the two posts which arrived >in my IN Box were the "Reply To" line, however, I have not yet been able >to >properly configure a filter (in Eudora) to distinguish on that basis. >Question #1 - What is Conrad doing wrong? >Question #2 - Eudora users - Can a filter be created to recognize the >"Reply To" line? > >Buccu thanks - > >David Skolnik ></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> <PRE> _____________________________ David M. Porritt dporritt@mail.smu.edu Meadows School of the Arts Southern Methodist University Dallas, TX 75275 _____________________________</PRE>