<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Actually... grin... not a bad point... but then Fonts are taken here as
"inflection" which is a part of language use after my mind... Which by
the way explains my use of the proverbial "grin" that seems to irritate
the pattooties out of a few select individuals.. hey what can I say...
I got a smiley face..
<p>grin.
<p>David Skolnik wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> Guys n' girls-
<br>I think you're missing the point. This is not about language.
This is about<font size=+2> <u>FONTS </u></font><font size=-2>
and
<i><u>PUNCTUATION!!!!!! </u></i>
The fault lies in the limitations of the printed word. Mr. Antatres,
over there, simply felt that if you are going to the trouble of rebuilding
a significant portion of a piano, you should rebuild the action as well.
How much of it? You'll probably find a range of opinions there as
well.</font>
<p><font size=-2>Mr. Moffat chose to focus on the use of that trigger word
"Restore". His post made copious use of
<u>underlining</u>, <u>exclamation
points!!!!</u>, and
<i><u>italics!!!!</u></i> It's hard not
to hear in it a certain chastizing tone. This may not have been his
intent. If only he had signed it : <i><u>LOVE BOB!!!!</u></i>
, much of the ensuing acrimonious exchange might have been avoided.</font>
<p><font size=-2>It is also clear, by the size of the responding font,
that Mr. Antares's feelings were hurt at such treatment. Also note
if you will, the absence of "Friendly Greetings..." Very
ominous! Last time his feelings were hurt he went away for quite
a while. It would be very sad/unfortunate for that to happen
again. Please, someone apologize.</font>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>With love,
<p>David Of New York</blockquote>
<p>--
<br>Richard Brekne
<br>RPT, N.P.T.F.
<br>Bergen, Norway
<br> </blockquote>
</html>