<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2>Well
have to wait the answer from Scott Jones, but I guess the 3d string =
couples
itself then with the 2 others as the phase opposition install (any light =
on the
subject ?)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2>From
now on I like to see how you perceive the change in tone, certainly not =
for the
better IMHO.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2>That
apart a certainly interesting concept used, but is not it the game =
between the 2
strings phasing and the third in opposition that gives that =
"impercetible move"
in nice unisons ?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2>I've
seen a 4 strings unisons grand (Borgato) once, and did not notice the =
same
lively effect, while the strings where certainly sounding strong and =
long, the
tone was more "straight" may be for very different reasons
also.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2>In the
end once the system is installed the unisons are more sounding like 2 =
strings
unisons than 3.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2>Greetings.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=787354416-28122003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN =
class=787354416-28122003><FONT
face=Arial color=#0000ff> Isaac =
OLEG</FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=787354416-28122003> </SPAN><BR><B>De :</B>
pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]<B>De la =
part de</B>
Tvak@aol.com<BR><B>Envoyé :</B> dimanche 28 décembre =
2003
17:03<BR><B>À :</B> pianotech@ptg.org<BR><B>Objet :</B> =
Re:
PitchLock<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid"><FONT
face=arial,helvetica><FONT face=Geneva color=#000000 size=2
FAMILY="SANSSERIF">List<BR><BR>Whether this little device would =
increase
tuning stability is one thing... What good is coupling TWO =
strings
together to keep them in tune with each other, when there's a third =
string
right next to them going its own way?<BR><BR>However, I wonder if this =
would
help to eliminate false beats in older pianos? Does this little =
metal
band actually provide a new termination point for the =
strings?<BR><BR><BR>Tom
Sivak</FONT><FONT face=Geneva color=#000000 size=2 =
FAMILY="SANSSERIF"></FONT>
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>