<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body> David C. Stanwood wrote: <blockquote cite="mid3.0.3.32.20040206085628.00df3404@pop.tiac.net" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">In this case it may be that the factory overdid it on the pre leading and had to back lead to get the down weight on spec... David Stanwood </pre> </blockquote> I doubt it... not Hamburg... but in the end who knows ?  It would be interesting to find out if they would actually spot a static weight problem and decide to opt for this kind of a solution instead of simply remaking the key, or removing front lead and plugging accordingly. My gutt feeling tells me this is not Hamburgs style. Cheers RicB <blockquote cite="mid3.0.3.32.20040206085628.00df3404@pop.tiac.net" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">... but isn't it so that action with too low key inertia causes for the pianist problems to control his playing ? Isn't some inertia desirable, as it integers smoothly all the unequalities of the pianist's fingers ? As long as apparent weight at fast playing is reasonable, and repetition good enough, I would think that the more inertia, the better control (kind of : "you want that effect, so you have to move your fingers accordingly" rather than "hey, I didnt want that effect" occuring with too low key inertia actions). Or do I miss something again ? Stéphane Collin </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________ pianotech list info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives">https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives</a> </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>