<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY=
="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 6/26/2005 9:00:3=
2 PM Central Standard Time, Erwinspiano@aol.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I think it's a manufacturing mi=
scalculation in how much the string was originally stretched &or twisted=
while wrapping.</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" BACK="#ffffff=
" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 PTSIZE=12 FAMILY="SANSSER=
IF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" BACK="#ffffff" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: =
#ffffff" SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"=
><BR>
That's an interesting observation and well worth researching among string ma=
kers, i.e. how much twist of the wire gets ahead of the wrap during the high=
-speed wrapping process, then how much slackens out of the wire after the sp=
inning stops. Also, how much twist (or torsional force) remains in the core =
held by the wrap itself (or in mis-making of the string, is the torsional fo=
rce over-applied leaving the core wire close to an elastic limit).<BR>
<BR>
PR-J</FONT></HTML>