<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; =
charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {margin-right:0in;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle18
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>That’s interesting because I =
tune
with an SAT and there are times when the FAC numbers do not produce a
particularly good tuning in certain sections on certain pianos. =
The
temperament is usually fine, but leaving the center octave, things can =
get
strange. For example, I tuned an S&S D a couple of days =
ago.
The FAC readings were something like 7.9, 9.9, 7.2. The upper =
middle of
the piano had very audible beats in the octaves, quite disturbing =
really.
Can’t imagine that there wouldn’t have been some deduction =
there.
I couldn’t really use the FAC numbers and feel good about what it
produced. I did check the measurements on different strings on and =
around
the target notes. I ended up using a default </span></font><font =
size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:navy'>8/7/6</span></font><font size=2 color=navy =
face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> setting and =
stretched
the whole thing using the DOB and used that as a guideline. It =
actually
worked pretty well, though I did the tuning largely aurally with the SAT =
as a
guide. Moreover, I thought that while an FAC reading was =
taken
initially on a test piano, a master tuning was created by consensus =
altering the
tuning as needed. So, while I would expect that an SAT tuning =
might very
well produce a passing score, that it would always produce a 100% score =
surprises
me. </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span =
style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p><font size=2 color=navy face="Times New Roman"><span =
style='font-size:10.0pt;
color:navy'>David Love<br>
davidlovepianos@comcast.net </span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 =
face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original =
Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> =
pianotech-bounces@ptg.org
[mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] <b><span =
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf
Of </span></b>David Ilvedson<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Monday, September =
12, 2005
7:39 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> pianotech@ptg.org<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: David =
Ilvedson/SAT
Tuning Test Scores</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New =
Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
So I just checked with Michael Kimbell, our San Francisco CTE and tuning
examiner and he concurred with my statement. =
</span></font></p>
<p =
style='margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><font =
size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>David =
Ilvedson</span></font></p>
<div style='border:none;border-left:solid black 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in =
0in 4.0pt'>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center =
style='margin-left:.5in;text-align:center'><font
size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal =
style='margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:
.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span =
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Original
message<br>
From: "Joe Garrett" <br>
<JOEGARRETT@EARTHLINK.NET>To: pianotech <br>
<PIANOTECH@PTG.ORG>Received: 9/12/2005 4:52:45 PM<br>
Subject: Re: David Ilvedson/SAT Tuning Test Scores</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 =
face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>David Ilvedson said: =
"</span></font>Somewhat
lack it may be but SAT III will always get a 100% score on PTG=<br>
tuning test...not too bad a place to begin. Not the =
stability part
of=<br>
the test though...that's the tuner totally..."</p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
David,</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Where, pray tell, did you glean that =
Preposterous
Idea! Not even! Check with Tuning Examiners, before you make such a wild =
claim!
Please?<G></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 =
face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>J</span></font><font size=2 =
face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>oe Garrett, R.P.T.<br>
Captain, Tool Police<br>
Squares R I</span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>