<HTML style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: MS Sans Serif"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US vLink=purple link=blue bgColor=white>
<DIV>
<DIV>I agree with Joe Goss. I also measure A2 and divide by 4, and add the result. I tune all the strings of the bass with this. With the exception of the last 2 bass notes on the tenor side, everything gets extremely close. I strip it off to do this, pulling in the unisons afterwards. </DIV>
<DIV> In the plain wires, I measure the low tenor notes and divide by 3. I do string by string with unisons here up to the top. </DIV>
<DIV> However, I have two things I do to modify my method. </DIV>
<DIV> First, I subtract a cent from the number I get when I divide by three. I.e., if I'm 27 cents flat, I divide by three and add 8, not 9. If I don't do this, it gets too sharp here.</DIV>
<DIV> Second, I only remeasure once in the tenor section. If I remeasure more than this, I get too sharp when I'm done. I just wait until I get past the break into the treble. Then I simply divide by 3 again and leave it at that. </DIV>
<DIV> My method requires that I try to be very accurate in my first pass. I spend much more time in the first pass than the final pass. The final pass I strip it off and tune only the center string, bottom to top, then unisons as I pull the strip out. </DIV>
<DIV> My way, FWIW.</DIV>
<DIV> Paul McCloud</DIV>
<DIV> San Diego</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=imatunr@srvinet.com href="mailto:imatunr@srvinet.com">Joe And Penny Goss</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To: </B><A title=pianotech@ptg.org href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">Pianotech</A></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> 09/12/2005 7:19:20 AM </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Best Tuning Strategy using SAT III</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For me also a good way to check and modify the FAC readings. Aural and machine combined.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This of course on a piano that is 10 or less off the 440.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For pitch raises I do the FAC only then measure A2. If it measures say 50 C I enter 25 C and tune from A0 to the first plane wire strings and then go with the 25% raise rewseting at C5 </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If a larger than 100C raise is necessary it is always at least two raises then fine tune.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I am always astounded at thework that the III can do for me. Almost like having an airconditioned cab on a hot combine. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hammer technique I believe to be a part of the varing results that techs get.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Quick and fast is what seems to get the results that I achieve.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Joe Goss RPT<BR>Mother Goose Tools<BR><A href="mailto:imatunr@srvinet.com">imatunr@srvinet.com</A><BR><A href="http://www.mothergoosetools.com">www.mothergoosetools.com</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=davidlovepianos@comcast.net href="mailto:davidlovepianos@comcast.net">David Love</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=pianotech@ptg.org href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">'Pianotech'</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, September 12, 2005 7:42 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Best Tuning Strategy using SAT III</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">If I’m seeking accuracy, after the calculation, I prefer to start at A4, then tune A3 to see if that critical octave is ok. Then tune down through the bass unisons as you go with checks that can be done with one hand, i.e., octave fifth, fourth, progressive thirds. Modify with the DOB on the fly if you need to. Then tune up through the treble doing the same thing. </SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN></FONT> </P>
<DIV>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy">David Love<BR>davidlovepianos@comcast.net </SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">-----Original Message-----<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] <B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>Robert Finley<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Monday, September 12, 2005 4:24 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> pianotech@ptg.org<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Best Tuning Strategy using SAT III</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></SPAN></FONT> </P>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Until now I have been performing the FAC stretch calculation/analysis using the SAT III on the piano and then began tuning chromatically from A0 upwards, tuning the single string unisons, and then the two and three string unisons as I go along, using rubber mutes. I am wondering whether it would be better to strip mute the piano, tune all the single strings, perform checks on the intervals and octaves, and then go back and tune all the unisons. </SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></SPAN></FONT> </P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">What would you advise that would produce the best, most accurate and fastest result? Thank you for your help. </SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></SPAN></FONT> </P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Robert Finley</SPAN></FONT></P></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>