<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html>   Greg Newell wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>Richard,     The world is your oyster! Write one! I'm sure we'd all love to see it! I know I would {:>) Greg Richard Brekne wrote: <a href="mailto:gnewell@ameritech.net"></a> </blockquote> Grin.. I love it Greg... Thanks for like throwing the whole ball in my yard.... BTW, I like my Oysters fried in garlic and butter... I am not sure what the world would think of being treated that way... Seriously tho..I suppose I will end up having to contract someone to do this when I get rich and famous. Robert Scott said he could do it for something under 3000 bucks last year... so I have a hard time accepting the idea that this is like a really difficult programming task that wouldn't work on toady's puters. I gotta admit I see a lot of parallels between how present day techs react to this idea of multipartial displays and how yesteryears techs reacted to ETD's in general... As for realization of this idea... it'll come sooner or later... so you'll get your wish.  For now tho, you'll have to settle for seeing what Verituner can and can not do. He at least seems unhampered with dealing with more then one partial at at time. I think I will drop this for now tho... I am sure I would get argumentative again if I didn't... :) Still I started out with the position that I thought there was some strange resistance among ETD authors towards multipartial displays... and this last exchange simply reinforces that standpoint. -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway <A HREF="mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no">mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no</A>  </html>