<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<p>Delwin D Fandrich wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>
<br>I make my comments about the cross-section of the hammershank only
because
<br>so many seem interested in using relatively massive hammers in an effort
to
<br>gain more power. Until the hammershank flex problem is dealt with this
<br>won't really do much good beyond messing up the overall feel of the
action.
<br>At least it won't achieve the desired results.
<p>Del
<br>
<br><a href="https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives"></a> </blockquote>
Actually... I am personally moving steadily away from a preference for
heavier hammers. But I am very curious as to why this particular combination
of heavy hammers, high ratio, low key mass, and lots of assist spring help
seems to be so well recieved at our conservatory. And otherwise curious
about the various moments that affect action dynamics, and what role they
play in different configurations.
<br>
<p>--
<br>Richard Brekne
<br>RPT, N.P.T.F.
<br>UiB, Bergen, Norway
<br><A HREF="mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no">mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no</A>
<br><A HREF="http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html">http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html</A>
<br><A HREF="http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html">http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html</A>
<br> </html>