<HTML>In a message dated 05/06/2002 8:42:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Tvak@AOL.COM writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I copied an offset chart for EBVT posted some time ago and have been using it happily with RCT for about a year. It produces a pleasing temperament with just enough color to make it interesting.  I am very happy with the results, but... Hoping to improve my product I went to Bill Bremmer's web site and copied the temperament sequence to tune it aurally and found that the RCT offset I've been using is not correct.  F-A, G-B, and C-E should all beat equally, and this offset chart consistently produces a C-E which is faster than the other two.   </BLOCKQUOTE> Hi list,  It seems that there's a lot of ways to tune a piano.Some sound good to some,even by mistake,while maybe not so good to others.I am not referring to this post,other than the piano sounded good by mistake.While I am interested in the other temperments,I also like ET.I have been tuning since the seventy's,and am probally the first call jazz pianist in my area.Maybe I have a tin ear,(which I don't believe),but when I play,or hear the concerts at the college I work for,the piano sounds wonderful.How it got started using ET I don't know.For all I know,maybe my TV would work better at 98 volts,instead of 110.Pardon my ranting,I just don't want to feel stupid because I happen to like the temperment I learned to tune on. Hazen Bannister</HTML>