<html>
<body>
Hi David, <br><br>
At 11:56 PM 9/12/05, you wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Joe,<br><br>
I'm beginning to think you're an idiot...if you think an aural tuning is
going to have some huge difference to an ETD tuning, you're nuts! The
fact is the Master Tuning is done aurally. </blockquote><br>
Not necessarily. It only has to be VERIFIED aurally! <br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">When they are done, a FAC tuning
will be within the tolerances of the Master tuning...1 cent I
believe. </blockquote><br>
Avery <br><br>
<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""> <br>
<hr>
Original message<br>
From: "Joe Garrett" <br>
To: pianotech <br>
Received: 9/12/2005 9:44:17 PM<br>
Subject: SAT Scores on Tuning Exam<br><br>
So I just checked with Michael Kimbell, our San Francisco CTE and
tunin=<br>
g examiner and he concurred with my statement. <br>
David ,<br>
Then Michael is on Drugs, IMO. <br>
The simple fact remains, that the Test Instrument is tuned Aurally, by at
least Three tuners, one of which must be a CTE. Since the piano is tuned
Aurally, there is no way in hell, the SAT will reproduce this! I'm sure
if you check with Paul Brown, he'll tell you that exams, of record, do
not bear out this B.S.! As for the claims of Reyburn and Verituner...That
smatters of the "Diaphramatic Soundboard" B.S. that we so
blatantly poo poo, on this list almost every day. Sales Hype, IMO.<br>
<font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=2>Joe Garrett, R.P.T.<br>
Captain, Tool Police<br>
Squares R I</font></blockquote></body>
</html>