<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Stéphane Collin wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid002601c4772d$05a48c00$7401fea9@OrdinateurStephane"
type="cite">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Do I see right, in the picture, that
the note at the left side of the srut seems to have a shorter speaking
length than the note at the right (or am I fooled by the persepctive of
the pic) ? And that at the right of the strut, choirs have three same
speaking length, while at the left the three speaking length per choir
are different (as Dale pointed out) ?</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Makes me think (like the limited
range of front duplex) that they didn't like monotonous uniformity of
sound all over the scale, back then.</font></div>
</blockquote>
I think the picture is fooling you on that point. Tho when I go back in
October I can take a few more shots to give a better view. You are
right about the top section unisions all having the same length and the
left side having different tho. Well, like I said at the outset... you
fellows that are actually building these things have probably seen this
all many times before... it just struck me as something I hadnt
noticed, and so I thought I'd ask about it.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
RicB<br>
</body>
</html>