<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: Killer Octave Question</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>----- Original Message -----</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>From: "Ron Overs" <<a
href="mailto:sec@overspianos.com.au">sec@overspianos.com.au</a>></block=
quote
>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Subject: Re: Killer Octave
Question</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>SNIP</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>> Sure the long bridge will rotate
backwards<br>
> on its axis (from end to end) just slightly to accommodate the
crown<br>
> of the board, but it will be so minimal as to be
insignificant.</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font color="#800080">Please try and
clarify the above statement. Are you defining an axis going from the
extreme treble end to the low tenor end of the long bridge? Then are
you speaking of the two ends rotating backwards to meet the crowned
board? I guess then one could speak of the killer octave area (or
thereabouts) rotating forward if the the two ends are considered as
reference points?</font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>If you imagine a line which passes through each end of the long
bridge, the bridge rotates around the axis of that line such that it
rises in the middle to accommodate the rising centre of the sound
board. When we started installing entire long bridges, we had it in
mind that we would crown the underside of the bridge to fit the crown
of the board, similar to John's suggestion. But when we built the
first basic bridge blank, we noticed that it fitted the board's
crowned profile almost perfectly as is. Consequently, we haven't
bothered crowning the underside of the bridge to this day.</div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>> The<br>
> rib profile, 'stress in extreme fibre' and paring profile
is where<br>
> its at!</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font color="#800080">I'm trying to
understand this statement. Rib profile - OK, the shape/curve of
the rib.</font></blockquote>
<div><br>
Yup.<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font color="#800080">Stress in extreme
fibre - what is that?</font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Look up your engineering handbook. The chapter on beams as load
bearing structures has the info. The maximum stress in extreme fibre
is the loading within the beam which results from a given load<font
color="#0000FF"> (this is always at a maximum at the top and bottom of
the beam, and virtually zero in the middle)</font>. After reading
about the behaviour of beams, take a look at any 1900 Blüthner or
Bechstein board with their low 18 mm high sound board ribs. No
surprises as to why they've sunk out in the middle right under the
long bridge. Its all about excessive 'stress in extreme' fibre.</div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><font color="#800080">Paring profile
- totally lost on this one - what is that?</font></blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>The paring<font color="#0000FF"> (you might have a different term
for it)</font> at the ends of the ribs have a marked influence over
the tonal outcome. Have a look under a few different pianos and think
about what you see and how they sound.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>By the way Terry, congratulations on your new venture into belly
work. Looking good.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Ron O.</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div>_______________________<br>
<br>
OVERS PIANOS - SYDNEY<br>
Grand Piano Manufacturers<br>
<br>
Web: http://overspianos.com.au<br>
mailto:info@overspianos.com.au<br>
_______________________</div>
</body>
</html>