<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=rol=
e_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV> Ron</DIV>
<DIV> Understood.</DIV>
<DIV> Dale</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><=
FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2> Ah hem .<BR>> I will be looking for it in t=
he
Good ,I mean Wood book. to confirm my <BR>> rumor. I guess =
the
real question is whose authority are you willing to <BR>> consider aa
a good enough source.<BR>><BR>>Erwins Pianos
Restorations<BR><BR>Hi Dale,<BR>Someone who actually made the test, with s=
ome
real equipment, and is <BR>capable of using and understanding scientific
methods and interpreting <BR>results without building fantastic worlds of
inference and randomly <BR>speculative "facts" from nothing at the first h=
int
of what they think they <BR>want to see. You know, someone competent and
objective who knows what <BR>they're talking about, and will draw conclusi=
ons
from data rather than <BR>inventing data to prove existing conclusions. If=
it's in Hoadley's book, <BR>I'd accept it. I'd also accept it from the For=
est
Service Lab, if it's in <BR>the Wood Book. I'm not hard to convince at
all.<BR><BR>Ron N</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>