<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: one rubber mute</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'>Sheesh! This =
is an archaic technique that should be put out of it's misery! Enough alread=
y! Please?????<BR>
Just BUY some more mutes Mr. Cheapskate!<G><BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><FONT FACE="Verda=
na"><BR>
Dude----maybe YOU are an archaic old poophead that needs to be put out of i=
ts(his?) misery...<g><BR>
<BR>
Bottom line is this: I tune this way because I like to---a lot--- and becau=
se it makes my tuning better, and because THAT makes me more money. If=
other people are interested in this old-school protocol, great.<BR>
If not, great. I think my tuning sounds better than any other tuning =
I’ve heard live, with the exception of a piano I heard that was prepar=
ed by Eric Schandall. I love it, my clients love it, it takes about the same=
time as alla y’all’s tuning---it’s all good. I’m no=
t advocating wholesale migration to the technique; I’m just keeping it=
alive because, for me, it makes the pianos sound so beautiful, and it’=
;s big fun for me.<BR>
<BR>
Actually, today I tuned an old, worn-out Steinway on the stage of the Holly=
wood Palladium. I went from start to finish in 47 minutes; it started out ab=
out 2 cents low (average) and ended up on pitch.<BR>
<BR>
I do a real, real close pitch raise in 20-25 minutes.<BR>
<BR>
I’m a good dancer, and I like making macaroni and cheese.<BR>
<BR>
Best to all....<BR>
<BR>
David Andersen</FONT></SPAN>
</BODY>
</HTML>