<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=windows-1252">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> Bill, there are a =
lot of
variables involved in how stable a piano might be after a pitch raise =
and fine
tuning. The major one in my mind is how far out was it to begin
with. The worst I've seen was 3 semitones flat. After tuning =
one
note, the next one up in chromatic sequence (untuned) was in perfect =
harmony a
third below the one I'd just tuned!! WOW. I'm sure this =
piano would
be drifting flat within 2 weeks even after a pitch raise and tune. =
That
brings up another point. How many technicians raise pitch in =
increments in
this case? I find no reason not to yank each string over pitch by =
1/3 of
the flatness no matter how flat it is. String breakage does not =
seem to be
a problem, and 40-50 cents over is not unusual. However in talking =
to
those in our Syracuse chapter leaving the piano below pitch, or raising =
in 10-20
cent steps until the proper pitch is reached it most common. Any
comments? Mike Kurta PNO2NER</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=pianowrmonroe@hotmail.com
href="mailto:pianowrmonroe@hotmail.com">William R. Monroe</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, April 17, 2002 =
3:16
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Charging for Pitch =
Raises</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Mike and List,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If one properly pitch raises an instrument, and finishes with a =
solid
fine tuning, is there validity saying that the instrument will not =
hold this
tuning as well as if it were tuned regularly? I was under the =
impression
that in this scenario, the instrument would hold tune well, perhaps =
only
slightly less well than a regularly serviced instrument on which PR =
are not
needed or performed.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mkurta@adelphia.net =
href="mailto:mkurta@adelphia.net">Mike
Kurta</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, April 17, =
2002 5:59
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Charging for =
Pitch
Raises</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> I never charge =
for a pitch
raise, however I don't discount if one isn't needed either. I =
used to
charge for mileage too, but don't any more. One price =
for all is
my rule now. I might be a bit higher than the norm for this =
area, but
I find it all averages out in the end. I like =
consistency. If a
pitch raise is needed, I explain to the customer what I'm doing, and =
that
the finished tuning will be up to pitch and sound great, but it =
won't stay
in tune quite as long this first time. (Assuming its been 3-5 =
years
since the last tuning, which is often the case). I then =
encourage them
to begin an annual tuning schedule which after 2-3 years will bring =
their
piano back to a stable situation. I prefer using this method =
rather
than either (1) raising the pitch in increments, thus leaving the =
piano at
less than A440, or (2) recommending another tuning be done in 1-3 =
months,
and again raising pitch in steps. Not every owner follows =
this
recommendation, but I hesitate to appear as though I'm pushing more =
tunings
as well as leaving the piano out of tune. If I do return in a =
year,
usually follow-up pitch raises are not necessary, and I feel the =
slight
additional charge for all tunings covers the occasional pitch raises =
that
are needed. Mike Kurta</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=dnereson@dimensional.com
href="mailto:dnereson@dimensional.com">Dave Nereson</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, April 17, =
2002 6:45
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Charging for =
Pitch
Raises</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=pianowrmonroe@hotmail.com
href="mailto:pianowrmonroe@hotmail.com">William R. Monroe</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">Pianotech</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 16, =
2002 6:26
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Charging for =
Pitch
Raises</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I was reading an old essay (PTJ August '90) by Rick =
Baldassin
regarding Piano Tuning Stability. Within that =
article, Rick
writes about tuning for a concert and remarks that after a =
rehearsal,
the treble was really out. 'Why? The treble notes =
were too
far out of tune to create a stable tuning in one pass on the
tuning.' He stated that when he tuned the instrument prior =
to the
rehearsal, the 6th and 7th octaves were flat, 'maybe as much as =
four
cents.'</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>So, in a nutshell, if your piano is four cents flat, your =
tuning
will not be stable (for a concert level tuning). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>My questions:</DIV>
<DIV> 1.) Really? Is four cents flat too much to get =
a stable
concert tuning?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2.) For our regular clients, when do we begin charging for =
a pitch
raise, 5 cents, 10 cents, 20 cents? I realize that neither =
all
clients, nor their instruments will require this level tuning, =
but where
do we draw the line and say we must raise pitch to get a stable
tuning?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I am very interested to hear as many opinions on this one =
as
possible.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thank you,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>William R. Monroe<BR>PTG Associate<BR>Salt Lake City, =
UT</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> Yes, 4 cents flat is probably too flat =
to get a
stable concert tuning in one pass. Back when people =
referred to
beats per second (at A 49) more often than cents, someone at a =
seminar
said that anything more than 2 beats per second flat would =
require a
pitch raise to be stable in one pass. I find (in the home, =
not
concert tunings) that that's about right most of the time. =
</DIV>
<DIV> For clients, whether regular or not, I =
suppose
you should charge extra for any tuning that requires more passes =
to
stabilize than one on a piano that's already
at pitch. I don't think I've ever done a =
"one-pass
tuning". It's always once through to do the initial =
tuning, then
another time through to re-tune the ones that slipped, then =
I take
out the ear plugs and go through again for a final =
touch-up. The
second two "passes" are very quick and are considered part of =
the
tuning. </DIV>
<DIV> If I had even a nickel for every free =
pitch
raise I've done, I could probably buy a new couch or =
something.
Sometimes I just don't want to go drag the customer away from =
what
they're doing to tell them there's going to be an extra =
charge.
Sometimes I charge and sometimes I don't -- I know, that's =
inconsistent,
but since the pitch raise takes only 10 or 15 minutes, I usually =
just
quickly bang it out rather than go get them to give 'em the =
lecture
about tension, humidity, dryness, string stretching, tuning =
every 6
months, etc. Even if I do, it doesn't do any good. =
They
still wait 2 to10 years before they get it tuned again, even if =
I leave
literature about it. I've almost given up on explaining =
about and
charging for pitch raises. Almost all pianos I tune need =
one,
except those that get tuned every year (schools, piano =
teachers), and
even some of those need a "quickie raise or lower" in the =
middle,
depending what season it was when they were last tuned. =
</DIV>
<DIV> I dunno, for me it's =
easier to
have the charge for a pitch raise figured in to the "regular" =
base fee,
and if it doesn't need a p.r., give them a $10 or $15 =
discount.
--David Nereson, RPT,
=
Denver</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></=
HTML>