<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 4/7/01 11:28:35 AM Central Daylight Time,
<BR>tunenbww@clear.lakes.com (Paul) writes:
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I'm an aural tuner, so setting this temperament was a bit of a struggle. It
<BR>did work out. All of the checks proofed correct. I had several people try
<BR>the piano. Their reactions is another story. </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR>I'm glad that you are an aural tuner because I have the ideal temperament for
<BR>you to try. It will be in the same general area as Jim Coleman's #11, yet
<BR>different enough to be quite significantly different in the overall effects
<BR>it produces when actual music is played. The difference is in the effects
<BR>that Equal Beating (EB) produces.
<BR>
<BR>While not attempting to say anything negative about Jim Coleman's idea, it
<BR>was formed simply by meting out certain proportions for various intervals,
<BR>giving up purity at the top of the Cycle of 5ths in order to avoid harshness
<BR>at the bottom. Mine does essentially the same thing but because of the EB
<BR>effect, you can play early music with it and have it mimic the sound of a
<BR>much earlier temperament which would have uncalled for harshness in the
<BR>remote keys when trying to play music from the 19th or 20th Centuries.
<BR>
<BR>What happens is a canceling out effect in the Rapidly Beating Intervals
<BR>(RBI), e.g., 3rds, 6ths, 10ths & 17ths that make them sound much purer than
<BR>they really are. This is not an imaginary effect. It is the same effect
<BR>found in such acoustical tricks as Noise Cancellation Systems and Beat
<BR>Eliminators. The gist of it is that when there are two sets of beats
<BR>occurring at the same time, they phase each other out so that they are not
<BR>perceived by the ear.
<BR>
<BR>This gives you an advantage in that you can have a true, Cycle of 5ths based
<BR>temperament that can and does work well with virtually any kind of music, the
<BR>way only ET is believed to be able to do. There are many myths about ET and
<BR>one of them is that it is "Universally" practiced. In fact, most aural
<BR>tuners cannot really produce a true ET. There is always some error and that
<BR>error does produce an effect or "color", as it is called in the music.
<BR>
<BR>The Equal Beating Victorian Temperament (EBVT) that I designed stays well
<BR>within the bounds of deviation (or "error") in ET that most aural tuners
<BR>produce. Therefore, it produces no sound so extreme (either too pure or too
<BR>harsh) that the *contemporary* ear will reject it. I designed and
<BR>implemented this temperament in 1992 and have used it ever since as my own
<BR>personal replacement for ET. I have, in fact, tuned no pianos in ET since
<BR>1989. I tune all kinds of pianos, in homes, schools, churches, concert
<BR>halls, restaurants, hotels, etc. I have a very loyal and devoted following
<BR>that really likes the way I make my pianos sound.
<BR>
<BR>Ed Foote's latest essay found in the liner notes of his new CD is quite
<BR>impressive. But I find a couple of areas of temperament research lacking in
<BR>his study that I usually find, even among the most knowledgeable alternative
<BR>temperament practitioners. There seems to be only one "Meantone", the most
<BR>extreme form, the one that makes the modern piano sound like an antique one
<BR>with virtually none of the resonance we expect to hear. There are whole
<BR>classes of temperaments that remain ignored and unexplored, the Modified
<BR>Meantones (not the same kind of temperament as a "Meantone") and the Quasi
<BR>Equal Temperaments. The EBVT is, in fact a Modified Meantone Temperament
<BR>although it also just barely satisfies the Rules for Well-Tempered Tuning as
<BR>written by Andreas Werkmeister in the 17th Century.
<BR>
<BR>Ed mentioned in a recent post that a Gershwin piece in Db would have sounded
<BR>"better" in ET. I've seen him say the same about Chopin and Debussy. I
<BR>respectfully disagree. There is a reason that these composers chose a remote
<BR>key, the challenge is to find the exact combinations that make it sound
<BR>vibrant and singing but not harsh. ET is merely the default choice for those
<BR>who do not have the answer. It neutralizes the piano to the point where it
<BR>would make no difference at all which key is chosen to play in. I hardly
<BR>think anyone would choose ET if they really knew how much better music could
<BR>sound with a more advanced approach to tuning.
<BR>
<BR>Below are the basic instructions for the EBVT. It cannot be tuned the way
<BR>most people are trying to attempt alternative temperaments, by imposing a set
<BR>of "Correction Figures" to a smooth curve calculation for ET using an
<BR>Electronic Tuning Device (ETD). If you tune the octaves the way I have
<BR>indicated in a very brief description, they will naturally be of different
<BR>sizes as you ascend and descend the scale. No smooth curve calculation can
<BR>produce this. They are known as "Tempered Octaves".
<BR>
<BR>If you or anyone is interested in reading a background article I have written
<BR>to support my ideas called "Key Color", please request it privately. It is
<BR>too long to post on Pianotech. Also, please inquire if you need further
<BR>explanation of how to tune the octaves. It is really quite easy and simple
<BR>but not the way you have probably been taught.
<BR>
<BR>Good luck with this and let me and/or the List know of your own reaction and
<BR>those of your customers.
<BR>
<BR>Regards,
<BR>
<BR>Bill Bremmer RPT
<BR>Madison, Wisconsin
<BR>
<BR> EBVT Aural Tuning Instructions: Introduction
<BR>
<BR>Below are the line by line instructions for tuning the EBVT. You will begin
<BR>by estimating just 2 intervals, a 5th which you will temper just slightly
<BR>more than you would for ET and a 3rd which you will temper about half as much
<BR>as you would for ET. Thereafter, all you will need to do is either tune an
<BR>interval perfectly pure or make it beat exactly the same as another. In
<BR>short, the temperament sequence itself provides you with the exact
<BR>information you need.
<BR>
<BR>The instructions include the aural way of proving your pure 4ths and 5ths.
<BR>When doing an initial first rough pass, it is not necessary to prove these
<BR>intervals so exactly. Also, the instructions have several places where they
<BR>tell you to "temporarily tune...etc". These are for people who are just
<BR>beginning to learn the temperament sequence.
<BR>
<BR>With experience and during the fine tuning of the temperament, you may skip
<BR>the "temporary" part the same way you learn to skip elementary steps in
<BR>Algebra. You simply learn how to make 2 intervals beat exactly the same as
<BR>each other by placing the note to be tuned at point where it creates 2
<BR>equally beating intervals. This is also called "Meantone tuning".
<BR>
<BR>The following is the way the 3rds played chromatically will sound from F3-F4.
<BR> Just imagine all values inverted and you have the most commonly made error
<BR>in tuning today which is known as "Reverse Well".
<BR>
<BR>F3-A3: slow
<BR>F#3-A#3: fast
<BR>G3-B3: slow
<BR>Ab3-C4: quite fast
<BR>A3-C#4: moderate, about the same as ET
<BR>Bb-D4: moderate
<BR>B3-D#4: very fast
<BR>C4-E4: slow, half the speed of ET
<BR>C#4-F4: very fast
<BR>
<BR>
<BR> Equal Beating Victorian Temperament
<BR>
<BR> (Equal Beating Victorianized Modified Meantone Temperament)
<BR>
<BR> Instructions for Aural Tuning
<BR> (With Tempered Octaves)
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>1. Tune A4 to A-440 pitch source.
<BR>2. Tune A3 to A4, stretching the octave to a a 6:3 type.
<BR>3. Temper E4 from A3, a narrow 5th, a little more than an Equal
<BR> Temperament (ET) 5th but still slightly less than 1 beat per second.
<BR> This is an estimate and may be checked or adjusted later, if
<BR> necessary.
<BR>4. Listen to the 4th, E4-A4. It should beat faster than the 5th, A3-E4
<BR> but should not be faster than 2 beats per second.
<BR>5. Temper C4 from E4, a wide Major 3rd to beat approximately 6 beats per
<BR> second. (Half the speed of the same interval in ET.)
<BR>6. Temper G3 from E4, a wide Major 6th so that it beats exactly the same
<BR> as the C4-E4 3rd. (Approximately 6 beats per second).
<BR>7. Temper B3 from G3, a wide Major 3rd so that it beats exactly the same
<BR> as both the C4-E4 3rd and the G3-E4 6th. (Approximately 6 beats per
<BR> second).
<BR>8. Temporarily tune D4 a pure 4th from A4 then notice the strong beat
<BR> in the 5th G3-D4 and sharpen D4 until the beat is exactly the same
<BR> in both the G3-D4 5th and the A3-D4 4th. (Faster than the same
<BR> interval in ET.)
<BR>9. Tune F3 a pure 5th from C4. To check this interval, use G#2 as the
<BR> test note and prove that the Ab2-F3 6th beats exactly the same as
<BR> the Ab2-C4 10th.
<BR>10. Tune F4 a pure 4th from C4. To check this interval, use G#3 as the
<BR> test note and prove that the 3rd Ab3-C4 beats exactly the same as the
<BR> Ab3-F4 6th.
<BR>11. Verify the F3-F4 octave. Using the test for a pure 5th which chooses
<BR> the lowest coincident partial of F3 & C4 and the test for the pure 4th
<BR> C4-F4 will yield a properly stretched octave, usually a compromise
<BR> between a 4:2 & 6:3 type.
<BR>12. Check the speed of the 3rd, F3-A3. It should beat exactly the same
<BR> or very similarly to the 3rds G3-B3 and C4-E4. If it is too slow,
<BR> adjust the note, E4 slightly flatter and begin the sequence again.
<BR> If too fast, adjust E4 slightly sharper and restart the sequence.
<BR>13. Tune Bb3 a pure 5th from F4. Use the test note C#3 to prove that the
<BR> Db3-Bb3 6th beats exactly the same as the Db3-F4 10th.
<BR>14. Listen to the resultant 3rd, Bb3-D4. Temper C#4 so that the A3-C#4
<BR> 3rd beats exactly the same as the Bb3-D4 3rd.
<BR>15. Tune F#3 a pure 5th from C#4. Use the test note A2 to prove that the
<BR> A2-F#3 6th beats exactly the same as the A2-C#4 10th.
<BR>16. Tune G#3 a pure 4th from C#4. Use the test note E3 to prove that the
<BR> E3-G#3 3rd beats exactly the same as the E3-C#4 6th. The Ab3-C4 3rd
<BR> will beat exactly the same as the F#3-A#3 3rd.
<BR>17. Temporarily tune D#4 a pure 5th from G#3 then notice the slight beat
<BR> between D#4 & A#3 and flatten D#4 until the G#3-D#4 5th beats exactly
<BR> the same as the A#3-D#4 4th. It will be a very slight beat, less than
<BR> the same interval in ET. The B3-D#4 3rd will beat very rapidly, at
<BR> least as fast as the F#3-A#3 & Ab3-C4 3rds below and similar to but
<BR> perhaps not quite as fast as the C#4-F4 3rd above.
<BR>18. When expanding the octaves do so in a manner which will cause the
<BR> 2nd inversion major triads of C, G, D, A, E, & B to have the 3rd & 6th
<BR> beat exactly the same. The octave should be stretched enough so that
<BR> there is a very slight beat in the single octave (approximately 1/2
<BR> beat per second) and that the tempered 5th will beat slower than the
<BR> 4th. When both the 4th and the 5th were pure in the temperament, the
<BR> octave will naturally be stretched a little less than an octave
<BR> whose 4th and 5th are tempered.
<BR>19. When expanding the outer octaves, try to reconcile the double octave
<BR> and the octave and a 5th (12th) so that the double octave and the 12th
<BR> beat exactly the same. (A very slight beat, almost inaudible). This
<BR> will naturally result in octaves which vary slightly in size up and
<BR> down the keyboard. These will quite effectively be "tempered
<BR> octaves".
<BR>
<BR>Bill Bremmer RPT
<BR>Madison, Wisconsin
<BR>April, 2000
<BR>
<BR>
<BR></FONT></HTML>