<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>
<BR>Hello Stephane;
<BR>
<BR> I have been fascinated with the " linked "
<BR>action principal for years. The thought that everything
<BR>would move at the same time and the same force
<BR>seems to me should work. Then why don't it.
<BR> It seems that Clarence Hickmann was close mainly
<BR>because positive regulation points were in place.
<BR>It,s to bad that the recession stopped work on it. I have
<BR>been trying to find a Hickmann model to copy and give
<BR>to the PTG Foundation.
<BR> The Schwander you speak of in my mind is not a true
<BR>linked action. It is linked to the hammer shank but not
<BR>the key. And this presents a problem of regulation
<BR>and as John Delacour says excessive wear. The sliding
<BR>escapement is not the best method of escapement
<BR>either. The 1860 Steinway double excapement action
<BR>had the same type of escapement and I think the same
<BR>problems of regulation. As far as regulating this action I
<BR>think we would have to use key depth to the best advantage
<BR>along with letoff for the best feel and check the hammer
<BR>close to the wire. The are my thoughts only, as I have
<BR>never regulated a " linked " Schwander. Good Lubrication
<BR>would be necessary also.
<BR>
<BR> Regards,
<BR> Jack Wyatt</FONT></HTML>