<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4134.100" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia size=2>The harm is.... if we allow one =
person to do it,
we have to allow everyone to do it. You want to allow an =
exception because
you happen to like it. That is too arbitrary and unfair. I view those =
posts as
Spam, or unwanted mail, and Duane uses the list</FONT><FONT =
face=Georgia size=2>
as an automatic mailer. Since there is such a disagreement, I believe =
exceptions
should not be made. Pianos only.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia size=2>So Richard, how come you carry on a =
post that
everybody else has let die, way longer than anyone else? If the harm is =
in the
replies, you are the worst offender. One time you came back from =
vacation
and tried to revive an OT post that had been dead for weeks. =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia size=2>Some people just like to stir up the
s.... <GRIN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Georgia size=2>Keith Roberts</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<P>Lets look at this last bit for a sec. He posted an OT note.... and =
if it
had just been let go... then whats the harm.. ?? The
<<harm>> started with some of the replies.
<P>RicB <BR>
<P>-- <BR>Richard Brekne <BR>RPT, N.P.T.F. <BR>UiB, Bergen, Norway =
<BR><A
href="mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no">mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no</A> =
<BR><A
=
href="http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html">http://home.broad=
park.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html</A>
<BR><A
=
href="http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html">http://www.hf.uib=
.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html</A>
<BR> </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>