<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1"><!-- BEGIN WEBMAIL STATIONERY -->
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1491" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I don't know the Steinway =
M touchweight
characteristics (they all have their own personality!), but sure, you =
can always
make an action play "stiffer". Just add or remove some =
lead in
the keys. First regulate friction - here's a great chance to have a nice =
amount
of friction in your hammer shank flanges - and not have to consider =
increased
friction here a problem at the end of the key. You would need to decide =
how much
of an increase in touchweight you want in the form of downweight (DW), =
and how
much in the form of inertia. If you decrease the front weight (FW) of =
the keys,
the static DW of the keys will increase and thus feel stiffer when =
playing
softly. If you add lead to both the front and rear of the key, you =
can
increase inertia without increasing FW. If you add lead to the rear of =
the key,
you will increase both DW and inertia. I think manipulation of FW to get =
your
desired DW and inertia will be the key (pun intended) for =
you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This all assumes that action geometry =
is good,
etc., etc. Are you familiar with Stanwood Touchweight Design
principles?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>While not being any sort of fabulous =
piano, if the
piano is in <STRONG><U>excellent</U></STRONG> condition and looks real =
nice, the
$3K is not overpriced - but perhaps at the very upper limit of =
reasonable (if it
needs work, then subtract as appropriate). </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>FWIW: I helped my son's piano teacher =
buy a 1960s
Knabe (Aeolian) baby grand that was in very good condition (excellent =
for its
age - was a one-owner (little old lady)) - likely a similar piano - I =
think she
paid about $1,200 for it - but she got a very good deal - the owner was =
dead and
didn't drive a very hard bargain. The teacher then went and sold her =
1920s
worn-out, banged-up, but quite playable (for the non-demanding
pianist) Aeolian microgrand for $1,600.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Terry Farrell</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><!-- WEBMAIL =
STATIONERY noneset -->
<DIV>Hi Folks,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Got a call from a client looking to buy a 1966 K&C baby =
grand.
Student takes lessons on a Steinway M and wants the K&C to play =
more like
the Steinway. I'm thinking a little stiffer perhaps. Wants to know if =
this can
be done / they are looking to spend $3k on this instrument (sounds =
overpriced
to me).</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks in advance for the input.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Rick Ucci/Ucci
Piano</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><!-- END WEBMAIL STATIONERY --></BODY></HTML>