<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I personally would love to see this class.
<p>RicB
<br>
<p>Billbrpt@AOL.COM wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>With all
due respect, I tried these figures (admittedly being inexperienced using
the FAC program). They did not at all produce what I do by ear.
The results must produce 4 pure 5ths and a number of intervals that beat
exactly the same as each other. These figures did not in any way
produce these results. Also, and just as important, using the FAC
program will not produce the unique Tempered Octaves that I use.</font></font>
<p><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>To date, there is no electronic
calculation that I know of which will produce the EBVT with Tempered Octaves.
I use the Direct Interval approach with the SAT. It is an alternative
and entirely different way of using the SAT which gives me consistently
the same results as I desire aurally.</font></font>
<p><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>If there are enough people
who want my unique system to be taught at the Convention in Chicago, you'll
all have to express your desires to the Institute Committee. And
fair warning to the IC: I won't do it in a 45 minute Mini Tech and
I also want to find an opportunity for the EBVT to be heard in a *MUSIC*
recital, (not an interval banging session).</font></font>
<p><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>As far as Tuneoffs go, I
would offer my system against Ed Foote's any day of the year. He
doesn't do what I do and I certainly don't do what he does. Mine
produces easily discernible and superior results.</font></font>
<p><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>Bill Bremmer RPT</font></font>
<br><font face="arial,helvetica"><font size=-1>Madison, Wisconsin</font></font></blockquote>
<p>--
<br>Richard Brekne
<br>RPT, N.P.T.F.
<br>Bergen, Norway
<br><A HREF="mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no">mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no</A>
<br> </html>