<html>
<font size=3>Regarding Ron Overs' remarks,<br><br>
There are many reasons to not criticize the design when speaking with the
customer. All you have to do is turn it around and think - what if
they said that about my piano?<br><br>
I am sorry to say that there is no such thing as a piano design which
cannot be criticized, yours included Mr. Overs. The very divergent
opinions expressed on this list show this. The aspects of
individualism we admire in designs from people like Overs, or Stuart, or
Del Fandrich are points of criticism for others. And it isn't only
the know-nothing salespeople selling against the innovative design - it
is often well intentioned but perhaps misguided piano technicians who
speak out against a design or method of construction, because it doesn't
suit their individual tastes.<br><br>
It is best to let the buyer decide if the individual traits of a
particular piano are good or bad. In the case of a technician
evaluating a piano for an owner, the desire on the part of the owner is
usually to know if this particular instrument is OK or not.
Pontificating on design disadvantages usually just upsets the owner, and
in the end often hurts the technician's reputation. I am not simply
preaching here - my position on this was formed through some very
unpleasant personal experiences long before I worked for any piano
companies.<br><br>
Once a piano buyer asks for opinions about which designs the technician
prefers, of course, then we should feel free to express those opinions,
and do our best to have a good factual basis for those them.<br><br>
Don Mannino RPT<br><br>
</font></html>