<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#d8d0c8"><FONT SIZE=2=
FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 5/23/03 1=
2:54:13 AM Central Daylight Time, collin.s@skynet.be writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Hello Wim</FONT><FONT COLOR=
="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d8d0c8" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERI=
F" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d8d0c8" SIZE=2=
FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">My purpose was to dig a bit =
into the string scaling theory. I would like to understand better the =
way constructors deal with tension, inharmonicity, striking point, smooth ch=
anges in all this (following the article of Dave Roberts in PTG journals abo=
ut 1981).</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d8d0c8"=
SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d8d0c8" SIZE=
=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">About string length meas=
urements, I once again find myself with too large relative errors, certainly=
in the trebble section.</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-=
COLOR: #d8d0c8" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d8d0c8" SIZE=2=
FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Stéphane Collin</FONT><FON=
T COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d8d0c8" SIZE=3 FAMILY="=
SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d8d0c8" SIZE=2=
FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
Stephane<BR>
<BR>
This is getting a little over my head. Guys like Del Fandrich are better sui=
ted for that kind of work. <BR>
<BR>
Good luck.<BR>
<BR>
Wim </FONT></HTML>