<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=260122418-26102004><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" =
color=#0000ff
size=2>OK, after Andre's reply my question still remains. =
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=260122418-26102004><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" =
color=#0000ff
size=2>Suppose I (first) play even, soft-though-firm, blows, say three =
or four
of them while tuning one of the strings of the unison and listening with =
the
core of my being. Then (second), to settle the pin, I strike a very hard =
staccato blow <EM><STRONG>but I do not "listen" to it</STRONG></EM> -- =
its
function is purely to equalize tension across the friction points and to =
zero
out any torque of the tuning pin. Finally (third), I play soft/firm =
again
and listen to the resulting unison. If it is not satisfactory, I repeat =
the
three steps, otherwise I go on to the next string.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=260122418-26102004><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" =
color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=260122418-26102004><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" =
color=#0000ff
size=2>Does step 2 -- the very hard staccato blow -- damage the beauty =
of the
unison? Is this a bad habit that should not be taught to new
tuners?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=260122418-26102004><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" =
color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=260122418-26102004><FONT face="Trebuchet MS" =
color=#0000ff
size=2>Maybe the very hard staccato blow is only necessary when the =
string has
been moved more than a very little bit?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT =
face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> =
pianotech-bounces@ptg.org
[mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]<B>On Behalf Of =
</B>antares<BR><B>Sent:</B>
Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:37 AM<BR><B>To:</B> =
Pianotech<BR><B>Subject:</B>
Re: Soft blows (was How we hear) or hard =
blows.<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>Just a few
things here :<BR>First of all, I tried to tell here that when we =
strike a note
<I>very</I> hard, the emphasis lies on the higher partials. I have =
tried this
out on my ETD partial analysis, and indeed it shows that the higher =
partials
are more present with this hard blow.<BR>This causes us to listen to =
strings
in a different way and the result we may find in the unisons : hitting =
the
strings with a not so hard blow will result in a more coarse, more =
rich
sound.<BR>Hitting the strings very hard will result in a unison which =
sounds
thin, rather short in length and unsatisfactory.<BR>Basically we can =
hear a
real difference if we hit VERY hard, like what concert tuners do =
daily, or
just less hard but still in a firm manner.<BR>The last one requires a =
very
good tuning technique and it definitely requires from the tuner to put =
his
hammer ALWAYS into the direction of the tail in the very first
place.<BR><BR>second : we should not confuse hard or soft blows with =
the way
we listen to, and perceive, piano sounds.<BR>A hard or softer blow =
literally
defines - more <I>or</I> less - the presence of higher or lower
overtones.<BR>The way we perceive piano sounds, and the way we choose =
to
enrich and power our unisons defines the difference between piano =
tuners in
general.<BR>The example I gave here of a technician working on a =
beautiful
concert grand, who made ugly (to my ears!) unisons, shows that indeed =
your
unison is not necessarily my unison.<BR><BR>After my initial ear =
opening
experience, I often experimented with colleagues on the very same =
instrument,
just to find out whether their 'tone' was different from mine, and =
indeed, the
unisons I re-tuned sounded completely different.<BR><BR>Lastly : to =
those who
tried out the hard versus soft blow but had no result, I say this =
:<BR>The
best 'place' on a piano to try this out, is in the first treble =
section, just
next (on right of) to the wound bass strings.<BR>This section is =
usually very
sonorous and rich sounding.<BR>Just take one unison and re-rune it, =
but this
time with tremendous blows, as if your life depends on it, just like =
the
professional life of a concert tuner who depends on his rock steady =
unisons
ok? If you do this, you will clearly hear a difference between this =
one unison
and the adjacent unisons.<BR><BR>It is my personal experience, that =
tuning
technique is far more important than being able to make the most =
refined
temperament.<BR>It is for that reason only that in one of the very =
best Piano
Academies (Hamamatsu) in the world, the young students learn to master =
tuning
technique first by doing pitch raise and pitch lowering ALL DAY long =
for three
Months (wow), and with the aid of a tuning machine. The result of =
EVERY tuning
is scribbled on a chalk board in the central hall, for everybody to =
see,
openly or sneakily. Showing their bad marks drives the students to the =
edge of
their abilities, and this usually results in already having quite a =
decent
tuning technique after those three Months.<BR>The next course is =
learning
about temperament, but this time without machines, and after one year, =
they
are often just as good (or much better even) than a tuner from our =
hemisphere
who has already worked quite a number of years.<BR>That's one of the =
main
reasons, why I, after having fought with piano's for the better part =
of my
professional life, put the emphasis on technique, and please with the =
aid of
one of the best ETD's. I can concentrate fully on technique, and on =
making
'tone'.<BR>BTW.... If someone here prefers to not use an ETD, than I =
have no
objections to that at all. How could I? and <I>why</I> should I? It is =
everybody's personal choice, and I truly understand the love and =
dedication of
making a very beautiful aural tuning.<BR>I have had more than my =
share, that's
why I choose for what I chose.<BR><BR>André
Oorebeek<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>On 26-okt-04, at 18:26, =
jason
kanter wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param =
0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>One
of the very first basics we learn is that we must set the pin with a =
firm
blow to equalize the string tension across the friction points. How =
does
this relate to the current discussion of using rather soft blows to =
tune
unisons? I *imagine* that you tune with soft blows, then settle the =
pin with
a hard blow, then listen again with soft blow to ensure the tuning =
has not
moved? But the hard blow has likely changed the tuning, so ... do =
you use
soft blows while raising the pitch, then lowering it to a smidgeon =
sharp,
then apply a firm blow to settle the string into exactly the right =
spot? If
we avoid hard blows entirely, surely the piano will be immediately =
put out
of tune by the =
pianist?<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?pa=
ram Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>Puzzled
in Seattle<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| <?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>Jason
Kanter . piano tuning regulation
repair<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?color><?param =
0000,0000,EEEE><?smaller>jkanter@rollingball.com<?/smaller><?/color><?col=
or><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>
. cell 425 830 =
1561<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>serving the
eastside and the san =
juans<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR><?smaller>-----Original
=
Message-----<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>From:<?/smaller></B><?smaller>
pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]<B>On =
Behalf Of
</B>Quentin =
Codevelle<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>Sent:<?/smaller></B><?smaller> =
Monday,
October 25, 2004 9:32 =
PM<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>To:<?/smaller></B><?smaller> =
pianotech<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>Subject:<?/smaller></B><?smaller> =
How
we hear to
Jeneetah<?/smaller><BR><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller>Hi,<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?=
param Arial><?smaller>Maybe
you should keep on making soft blows, but try to hit the key =
quickly,
without listening to the note during 15 sec like you =
said.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller>That
way you'll be able to hear the "attack" of the note, the first stage =
of the
sound that is =
produced.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller>Having
a clear and pure sounding attack is very important for me, and I've =
never
succeeded in having a clear attack when tuning with listening to the =
note
more than 2 or 3 =
seconds.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller>For
me, when I tune, when my attack is clear, the rest is also, and my =
unisson
has enough "length" most of =
times.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller>I
need much concentration right now to make clean unissons on every =
note with
this technique, that means it takes some time to have a good =
eveness.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller>But
since the beginning, you should hear a difference, YOUR sound =
will be
turning from black to =
white.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller>Andre?<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR> <BR><?fontfamily=
><?param =
Arial><?smaller>Quentin.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>fri=
endly
greetings<BR>from<BR>André Oorebeek<BR><BR>"where <I>Music</I> is, =
no harm can
be"<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>