<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080>Comments below:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080>Terry Farrell</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> <SPAN id=__#Ath#SignaturePos__></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message -----
<DIV>From: "Richard Brekne" <<A
href="mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no">Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no</=
A>></DIV>
<DIV>To: <<A =
href="mailto:pmc333@earthlink.net">pmc333@earthlink.net</A>>;
"Pianotech" <<A
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>></DIV>
<DIV>Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 3:11 AM</DIV>
<DIV>Subject: Re: Key Leads and Inertia</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>> Paul McCloud wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > John:<BR>>
> I fail to see what =
this has
to do with real-world dynamics.<BR>> > Since the lead is integral =
with the
keystick, not suspended by a thread,<BR>> > the inertia is going =
to be the
same no matter how much acceleration is<BR>> > generated by the =
pianist's
finger. What am I missing?<BR>>
> Paul =
McCloud<BR>>
> San Diego<BR>> =
<BR>>
I've wondered about this two, scratching my head a bit. But taking =
things
at<BR>> face value I do have a couple questions if somebody has the =
answers
handy.<BR>> <BR>> 1. Isnt this question about lead in the key =
really about
its total mass, and<BR>> if you first were going to conceptually
<<de-couple>> the lead mass and<BR>> dangle it on a =
string,
wouldnt you have to do that for the wood mass as well<BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080>Well yes, but...... John is trying to =
demonstrate what
the <EM>addition</EM> of lead to a key makes. The key with no lead =
with
have certain inertia characteristics. The key with the lead will have =
different
inertia characteristics. Comparing the force required to push the key =
down
slowly (less than the acceleration due to gravity) with no lead and with =
the
lead will reveal that less finger force is required when you have =
lead in
the front portion of the key. Comparing no lead and lead when =
applying a
forte blow (much greater acceleration than that due to gravity), it =
will
require more force applied to the key with the lead to accelerate the
key at the same rate as with no lead. Decoupling the lead in =
the
diagram is simply to help visualize this =
phenomena.</FONT><BR> <BR>> 2.
How fast is the approximate fastest we could expect the key to =
be<BR>>
accelerated by human fingers in the first place ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080>Lift the front of the key up. Drop it. That =
is the
acceleration due to gravity. A forte blow is many times (est.) the =
acceleration
rate due to gravity.</FONT><BR> <BR>> 3. Exceeding 980/sec^2 =
just means
you are not getting any more <<help>> as<BR>> it were =
from the
force that is gravity. But this isnt the same as saying<BR>> that =
doing so
somehow creates an increase in resistance to<BR>> acceleration....yes =
?? Its
not like gravity has a kind of reverse gear<BR>> affect here.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080>No, gravity does not change, =
it is an
acceleration force that is consistent. The pianist is the one =
that is
applying an additional acceleration force. If the finger force is less =
than that
of gravity, adding lead to the key will decrease the amount of =
force
required to push the key down at some acceleration rate less =
than that
of gravity. If the finger force is greater than that of gravity, adding =
lead to
the key will increase the amount of force required to push the key down
at some acceleration rate greater than that of
gravity.</FONT><BR> <BR>> 4. From your (Johns) diagram about how =
to
figure Inertia I have a question<BR>> that goes along the same lines. =
Seems
like it would be better to measure<BR>> points independant of lead =
placement,
and rather symetrical accross the<BR>> front half of the key... or =
what
?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080>Perhaps I missed something (did I?). Did =
someone post
regarding calculating inertia? Could you repost? (Please!)?
</FONT><BR> <BR>> Cheers<BR>> RicB<BR>> <BR>> =
--<BR>>
Richard Brekne<BR>> RPT, N.P.T.F.<BR>> UiB, Bergen, Norway<BR>> =
<A
href="mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no">mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no</A><BR>&=
gt; <A
href="http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html">http://home.broad=
park.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html</A><BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> =
_______________________________________________<BR>>
pianotech list info: <A
href="https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives">http://www.ptg.org=
/mailman/listinfo/pianotech</A></DIV></BODY></HTML>