<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: compression waves</title></head><body>
<div>At 1:07 AM -0500 11/21/01, Stephen Birkett wrote:</div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>As for changing the tension of the
wrapping wire what might be happending<br>
there to change the long. freq? The continuous wrapping wire [it is
coiled<br>
around the core of course] can also produce long. standing waves
between<br>
its two ends, i.e. vibrating co-axial to the wrapping wire (spiral).
The<br>
length of the wrapping wire is much longer than the core, and this can
be<br>
expected to produce quite low frequencies. From string makers'
experience,<br>
can the wrapping parameters mentioned by Del affect the overall length
of<br>
wrapping wire required? That might explain the different frequencies
of</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Harold's Mary's lamb.</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div align="center"><img
src="cid:a05100301b821f828ff93@[195.147.234.72].1.0"></div>
<div>The greater the pull on the copper, the greater the reduction in
diameter of the cover. Picture A shows the theoretical covered
string often used by theoretical people in their calculations.
Figure B is a truer depiction of the string. Sufficient tension
needs to be applied to the covering wire to lash it tightly at all
points to the steel. The effective 'wrap factor' is a function
of the tangential speed of the wire and the brake on the covering
wire. The further the brake from the steel, the more regular the
tension on the covering wire. As the copper is forced to coil
round the steel it is flattened considerably at the point of contact
and its structure becomes more brittle. The reduction of the
vertical diameter varies, according to the gauge of the copper,
between 9% and 6%. At the same time the frequency of the coils
exceeds slightly the nominal diameter of the wire. A skilled
operator will achieve predictable and regular diameters. When I
train a new man, he learns the required pull by reference to target
tables and the scale worksheet includes a column for the target
diameter for each string. No amount of automation will ever
obviate the need for a skilled operator, though a certain amount of
mechanical automation can ensure consistency and take the sweat out of
the work. The results of fully automated stringmaking can easily
be judged in any cheap piano shop.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>That's only answered a bit of the question, bit I've got to get
some sleep!</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>JD</div>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>